338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30954725)
21. Mitigation of methane emissions in a pilot-scale biocover system at the AV Miljø Landfill, Denmark: 2. Methane oxidation.
Scheutz C; Cassini F; De Schoenmaeker J; Kjeldsen P
Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():203-212. PubMed ID: 28161333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Emission of greenhouse gases from waste incineration in Korea.
Hwang KL; Choi SM; Kim MK; Heo JB; Zoh KD
J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():710-718. PubMed ID: 28371748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration: Expected outcomes based on US landfill gas collection regulations.
Anshassi M; Smallwood T; Townsend TG
Waste Manag; 2022 Apr; 142():44-54. PubMed ID: 35176598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Uncontrolled methane emissions from a MSW landfill surface: influence of landfill features and side slopes.
Di Trapani D; Di Bella G; Viviani G
Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2108-15. PubMed ID: 23465313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of leachate and landfill gas on the ecosystem and health: Research trends and the way forward towards sustainability.
Ghosh A; Kumar S; Das J
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jun; 336():117708. PubMed ID: 36913859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Greenhouse gas emissions from semi-aerobic bioreactor landfills with different vent-pipe diameters.
Jiang G; Liu D; Chen W; Han Z; Li Q
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17563-17572. PubMed ID: 33400112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Field Measurements to Methane Emissions Models at a New Landfill.
De la Cruz FB; Green RB; Hater GR; Chanton JP; Thoma ED; Harvey TA; Barlaz MA
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 50(17):9432-41. PubMed ID: 27455372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Study on greenhouse gas emissions from urban waste disposal system: a case study in Xiamen].
Yu Y; Cui SH; Lin JY; Li F
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Sep; 33(9):3288-94. PubMed ID: 23243894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of seasonality, transport pathway, and spatial structure on greenhouse gas fluxes in a restored wetland.
McNicol G; Sturtevant CS; Knox SH; Dronova I; Baldocchi DD; Silver WL
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Jul; 23(7):2768-2782. PubMed ID: 27888548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Greenhouse gas accounting of the proposed landfill extension and advanced incineration facility for municipal solid waste management in Hong Kong.
Woon KS; Lo IM
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Aug; 458-460():499-507. PubMed ID: 23697849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Field assessment of semi-aerobic condition and the methane correction factor for the semi-aerobic landfills provided by IPCC guidelines.
Jeong S; Nam A; Yi SM; Kim JY
Waste Manag; 2015 Feb; 36():197-203. PubMed ID: 25488731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Methane emissions from trees planted on a closed landfill site.
Fraser-McDonald A; Boardman C; Gladding T; Burnley S; Gauci V
Waste Manag Res; 2022 Nov; 40(11):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 35380070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions from the human-impacted Seine watershed in France.
Marescaux A; Thieu V; Garnier J
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 643():247-259. PubMed ID: 29936166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessing methods to estimate emissions of non-methane organic compounds from landfills.
Saquing JM; Chanton JP; Yazdani R; Barlaz MA; Scheutz C; Blake DR; Imhoff PT
Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2260-70. PubMed ID: 25108756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Micrometeorological measurements of methane and carbon dioxide fluxes at a municipal landfill.
Lohila A; Laurila T; Tuovinen JP; Aurela M; Hatakka J; Thum T; Pihlatie M; Rinne J; Vesala T
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(8):2717-22. PubMed ID: 17533829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Improving leachate quality and optimizing CH
Li W; Sun Y; Wang H; Wang YN
Chemosphere; 2018 Oct; 209():839-847. PubMed ID: 30114732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Greenhouse gas budget (CO2, CH4 and N2O) of intensively managed grassland following restoration.
Merbold L; Eugster W; Stieger J; Zahniser M; Nelson D; Buchmann N
Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Jun; 20(6):1913-28. PubMed ID: 24395474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the potentialities to reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions resulting from various treatments of municipal solid wastes (MSW) in moist tropical climates: application to Yaounde.
Ngnikam E; Tanawa E; Rousseaux P; Riedacker A; Gourdon R
Waste Manag Res; 2002 Dec; 20(6):501-13. PubMed ID: 12549662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A correction in the CDM methodological tool for estimating methane emissions from solid waste disposal sites.
Santos MM; van Elk AG; Romanel C
J Environ Manage; 2015 Dec; 164():151-60. PubMed ID: 26363977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Forest and grassland cover types reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils.
Baah-Acheamfour M; Carlyle CN; Lim SS; Bork EW; Chang SX
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 571():1115-27. PubMed ID: 27450260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
