191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30954794)
1. Credence cues of pork are more important than consumers' culinary skills to boost their purchasing intention.
Argemí-Armengol I; Villalba D; Ripoll G; Teixeira A; Álvarez-Rodríguez J
Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():11-21. PubMed ID: 30954794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consumer preferences for reduced antibiotic use in Danish pig production.
Denver S; Jensen JD; Christensen T
Prev Vet Med; 2021 Apr; 189():105310. PubMed ID: 33667759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for safe pork products in rural Kenya.
Gichuyia CM; Mtimet N; Fèvre EM; Thomas LF; Gathura PB; Onono JO; Akaichi F
Meat Sci; 2024 May; 211():109450. PubMed ID: 38350245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consumers' perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled 'raised without antibiotics'.
Bradford H; McKernan C; Elliott C; Dean M
Appetite; 2022 Apr; 171():105900. PubMed ID: 34968563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Australian consumer preferences for fresh pork meat attributes: A best-worst approach on 46 attributes.
Duong C; Sung B; Lee S; Easton J
Meat Sci; 2022 Nov; 193():108954. PubMed ID: 36041289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can innovations in traditional pork products help thriving EU untapped pig breeds? A non-hypothetical discrete choice experiment with hedonic evaluation.
Kallas Z; Varela E; Čandek-Potokar M; Pugliese C; Cerjak M; Tomažin U; Karolyi D; Aquilani C; Vitale M; Gil JM
Meat Sci; 2019 Aug; 154():75-85. PubMed ID: 31004943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health Innovation in Patty Products. The Role of Food Neophobia in Consumers' Non-Hypothetical Willingness to Pay, Purchase Intention and Hedonic Evaluation.
Kallas Z; Vitale M; Gil JM
Nutrients; 2019 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30791660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.
Verbeke W; Liu R
Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding consumers' perceptions towards Iberian pig production and animal welfare.
García-Gudiño J; Blanco-Penedo I; Gispert M; Brun A; Perea J; Font-I-Furnols M
Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108317. PubMed ID: 32980720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition of Consumers' Characteristics of Purchasing Farm Produce with Safety Certificates and Their Influencing Factors.
Wang J; Gao Z; Shen M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30558279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Where's the beef? Retail channel choice and beef preferences in Argentina.
Colella F; Ortega DL
Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():86-94. PubMed ID: 28662454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment.
Grunert KG; Sonntag WI; Glanz-Chanos V; Forum S
Meat Sci; 2018 Mar; 137():123-129. PubMed ID: 29175765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Willingness to Pay a Higher Price for Pork Obtained Using Animal-Friendly Raising Techniques: A Consumers' Opinion Survey.
Giannetto C; Biondi V; Previti A; De Pascale A; Monti S; Alibrandi A; Zirilli A; Lanfranchi M; Pugliese M; Passantino A
Foods; 2023 Nov; 12(23):. PubMed ID: 38231599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consumers' view on pork: Consumption motives and production preferences in ten European Union and four non-European Union countries.
Lin-Schilstra L; Backus G; Snoek H; Mörlein D
Meat Sci; 2022 May; 187():108736. PubMed ID: 35123247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The United States pork niche market phenomenon.
Honeyman MS; Pirog RS; Huber GH; Lammers PJ; Hermann JR
J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2269-75. PubMed ID: 16864889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.
Liang Y; Xu Y; Lai D; Hua G; Huang D; Wang H; Li H; Han L
Meat Sci; 2023 Jan; 195():108994. PubMed ID: 36240585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
