145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30955687)
1. Does software optimization influence the radiologists' perception in low dose paediatric pelvic examinations?
Precht H; Waaler D; Outzen CB; Brock Thorsen JB; Steen T; Hellfritzsch MB; Aagesen H; Holst AK; Le P; Lindequist S; Rasmussen L; Tingberg A
Radiography (Lond); 2019 May; 25(2):143-147. PubMed ID: 30955687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CAN SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE REPLACE A GRID IN DR PELVIC EXAMINATIONS?
Precht H; Mørup SD; Tingberg A; Outzen CB; Kusk KW; Nielsen RM; Midtgård M; Winther MB; Waaler D; Kusk MW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31111927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New developed DR detector performs radiographs of hand, pelvic and premature chest anatomies at a lower radiation dose and/or a higher image quality.
Precht H; Tingberg A; Waaler D; Outzen CB
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Feb; 27(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 24221693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital radiography: optimization of image quality and dose using multi-frequency software.
Precht H; Gerke O; Rosendahl K; Tingberg A; Waaler D
Pediatr Radiol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):1112-8. PubMed ID: 22526280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increasing source-to-image distance to reduce radiation dose from digital radiography pelvic examinations.
England A; Evans P; Harding L; Taylor EM; Charnock P; Williams G
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25739106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations.
Persliden J; Beckman KW; Geijer H; Andersson T
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12042972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose optimisation in paediatric radiography - Using regression models to investigate the relative impact of acquisition factors on image quality and radiation dose.
Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; England A
Phys Med; 2019 Dec; 68():61-68. PubMed ID: 31751806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can advanced edge enhancement software improve image quality to visualise tubes, catheters and wires in digital chest radiographs?
Kristensen SV; Outzen C; Grau LM; Larsen TR; Bidstrup M; Egeskjold MV; Knude JA; Juhl D; Precht H
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jan; 29(1):165-170. PubMed ID: 36395686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
Smet MH; Breysem L; Mussen E; Bosmans H; Marshall NW; Cockmartin L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital pelvic radiography: increasing distance to reduce dose.
Heath R; England A; Ward A; Charnock P; Ward M; Evans P; Harding L
Radiol Technol; 2011; 83(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 21908777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of a novel edge enhancement software on image quality of DR hand images of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Outzen CB; Maron D; Nissen J; Munk J; Grau LM; Juhl D; Precht H
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):877-882. PubMed ID: 33676836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New image quality and dose reduction technique for pediatric digital radiography.
Feghali JA; Chambers G; Delépierre J; Chapeliere S; Mannes I; Adamsbaum C
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2021; 102(7-8):463-470. PubMed ID: 33547025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iterative scatter correction for grid-less skeletal radiography allows improved image quality equal to an antiscatter grid in adjunct with dose reduction: a visual grading study of 20 body donors.
Lisson CG; Lisson CS; Kleiner S; Regier M; Beer M; Schmidt SA
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):735-741. PubMed ID: 30149748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL HAND EXAMINATION ON SIX OPTIMISED DR SYSTEMS.
Precht H; Outzen CB; Kusk MW; Bisgaard M; Waaler D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 May; 194(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 33969425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographers' perspectives' on Visual Grading Analysis as a scientific method to evaluate image quality.
Precht H; Hansson J; Outzen C; Hogg P; Tingberg A
Radiography (Lond); 2019 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S14-S18. PubMed ID: 31481182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation dose reduction for musculoskeletal computed tomography of the pelvis with preserved image quality.
Zabak E; Omar H; Boothe E; Tenorio L; Guild J; Abbara S; Chhabra A
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):375-385. PubMed ID: 30155628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimisation of the lateral lumbar spine projection using an air-gap technique.
Bellizzi A; Zarb F
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 32052755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
