145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30955687)
21. Application of 80-kVp scan and raw data-based iterative reconstruction for reduced iodine load abdominal-pelvic CT in patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy referred for oncological assessment: effects on radiation dose, image quality and renal function.
Nagayama Y; Tanoue S; Tsuji A; Urata J; Furusawa M; Oda S; Nakaura T; Utsunomiya D; Yoshida E; Yoshida M; Kidoh M; Tateishi M; Yamashita Y
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20170632. PubMed ID: 29470108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of automatic exposure control system chamber for the dose optimization when examining pelvic in digital radiography.
Kim SC; Lee HK; Lee YS; Cho JH
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 26410466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose optimisation of double-contrast barium enema examinations.
Berner K; Båth M; Jonasson P; Cappelen-Smith J; Fogelstam P; Söderberg J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):388-92. PubMed ID: 20231164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION FRAMEWORK FOR JOINT OPTIMISATION OF IMAGE QUALITY AND PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL PAEDIATRIC RADIOGRAPHY.
Menser B; Manke D; Mentrup D; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):371-7. PubMed ID: 26628612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultralow-Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography: Comparison of 2 Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in a Prospective Clinical Study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karaosmanoglu A; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Do S; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 26182223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL IMAGE QUALITY IN PAEDIATRIC ABDOMINAL CT EXAMINATIONS: DEPENDENCY ON THE LEVEL OF ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION (ASiR) AND THE TYPE OF CONVOLUTION KERNEL.
Larsson J; Båth M; Ledenius K; Caisander H; Thilander-Klang A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):123-9. PubMed ID: 26922785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of image quality of a standard and two dose-reducing protocols in paediatric pelvic CT.
Ratcliffe J; Swanson CE; Hafiz N; Frawley K; Coakley K; Cloake J
Pediatr Radiol; 2003 Mar; 33(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12612816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Image processing setting adaptions according to image dose and radiologist preference can improve image quality in computed radiography of the equine distal limb: A cadaveric study.
Seeber M; Lederer KA; Rowan C; Strohmayer C; Ludewig E
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2024 Jan; 65(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 38098240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine images: a comparison between FFE and VGA.
Tingberg A; Båth M; Håkansson M; Medin J; Besjakov J; Sandborg M; Alm-Carlsson G; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):53-61. PubMed ID: 15933081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quality-controlled dose-reduction of pelvic X-ray examinations in infants with hip dysplasia.
Kloth JK; Neumann R; von Stillfried E; Stiller W; Burkholder I; Kauczor HU; Ewerbeck V; Weber MA
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):233-238. PubMed ID: 26724671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimisation of tube voltage for conventional urography using a Gd2O2S:Tb flat panel detector.
Zachrisson S; Hansson J; Cederblad A; Geterud K; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):86-91. PubMed ID: 20223848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiation dose reduction for chest CT with non-linear adaptive filters.
Singh S; Digumarthy SR; Back A; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23185071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multislice CT of the pelvis: dose reduction with regard to image quality using 16-row CT.
Gurung J; Khan MF; Maataoui A; Herzog C; Bux R; Bratzke H; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15806366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dependency of image quality on acquisition protocol and image processing in chest tomosynthesis-a visual grading study based on clinical data.
Jadidi M; Båth M; Nyrén S
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20170683. PubMed ID: 29565673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Optimal abdominal CT protocol for obese patients.
Qurashi A; Rainford L; Ajlan A; Khashoggi K; Ashkar L; Al-Raddadi M; Al-Ghamdi M; Al-Thobaiti M; Foley S
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):e1-e12. PubMed ID: 29306386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective evaluation of image quality with use of a patient image gallery for dose reduction in pediatric 16-MDCT.
Honnef D; Wildberger JE; Haras G; Hohl C; Staatz G; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):467-73. PubMed ID: 18212234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimising image quality and radiation dose for neonatal incubator imaging.
Tugwell-Allsup J; Morris RW; Hibbs R; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e258-e263. PubMed ID: 32279922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
