These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30957141)

  • 1. Half of Purposeful Baseline Sandbaggers Undetected by ImPACT's Embedded Invalidity Indicators.
    Raab CA; Peak AS; Knoderer C
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2020 Apr; 35(3):283-290. PubMed ID: 30957141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): a systematic review of the prevalence and assessment of invalid performance.
    Gaudet CE; Weyandt LL
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27687890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ability of CNS vital signs to detect coached sandbagging performance during concussion baseline testing: a randomized control trial.
    Anderson MN; Lempke LB; Bell DH; Lynall RC; Schmidt JD
    Brain Inj; 2020 Feb; 34(3):369-374. PubMed ID: 32026729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of invalid ImPACT baseline test results among high school athletes with invalidity and sandbagging indices.
    Tsushima WT; Lawton DRY; Kimata C; Siu AM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Oct; 37(7):1516-1529. PubMed ID: 36458597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sandbagging on the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) in a high school athlete population.
    Higgins KL; Denney RL; Maerlender A
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 May; 32(3):259-266. PubMed ID: 28431031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neuropsychological testing for sports-related concussion: how athletes can sandbag their baseline testing without detection.
    Erdal K
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Aug; 27(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 22684033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invalid Baseline Testing with ImPACT: Does Sandbagging Occur with High School Athletes?
    Tsushima WT; Yamamoto MH; Ahn HJ; Siu AM; Choi SY; Murata NM
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2021; 10(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 31407597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized neurocognitive assessments and detection of the malingering athlete.
    Siedlik JA; Siscos S; Evans K; Rolf A; Gallagher P; Seeley J; Vardiman J
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2016 Sep; 56(9):1086-91. PubMed ID: 26472603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valid but Invalid: Suboptimal ImPACT Baseline Performance in University Athletes.
    Walton SR; Broshek DK; Freeman JR; Cullum CM; Resch JE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1377-1384. PubMed ID: 29485429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Financial incentives influence ImPACT validity indices but not cognitive composite scores.
    Merritt VC; Rabinowitz AR; Guty E; Meyer JE; Greenberg LS; Arnett PA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Apr; 41(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 30516088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Institutionally Based ImPACT Test® Normative Values May Differ from Manufacturer-Provided Normative Values.
    Walton SR; Broshek DK; Freeman JR; Hertel J; Meyer JP; Erdman NK; Resch JE
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2020 Apr; 35(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 31711107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive "success" in the setting of performance validity test failure.
    Tierney SM; Matchanova A; Miller BI; Troyanskaya M; Romesser J; Sim A; Pastorek NJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 37555316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prevalence and correlates of scores falling below ImPACT embedded validity indicators among adolescent student athletes.
    Liu BC; Iverson GL; Cook NE; Schatz P; Berkner P; Gaudet CE
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2024 Jul; 38(5):1175-1192. PubMed ID: 38233364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An updated review of the prevalence of invalid performance on the Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
    Messa I; Korcsog K; Abeare C
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Oct; 36(7):1613-1636. PubMed ID: 33356881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Sandbagging" baseline test performance on ImPACT, without detection, is more difficult than it appears.
    Schatz P; Glatts C
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 May; 28(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 23403552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel ImPACT validity indices in collegiate student-athletes with and without histories of ADHD or academic difficulties.
    Manderino LM; Zachman AM; Gunstad J
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30516427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the test-retest reliability of symptom indices associated with the ImPACT post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS).
    Merritt VC; Bradson ML; Meyer JE; Arnett PA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):377-388. PubMed ID: 28728465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rates and Predictors of Invalid Baseline Test Performance in High School and Collegiate Athletes for 3 Computerized Neurocognitive Tests: ANAM, Axon Sports, and ImPACT.
    Nelson LD; Pfaller AY; Rein LE; McCrea MA
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26059178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of Invalid Performance on Baseline Testing for Sport-Related Concussion by Age and Validity Indicator.
    Abeare CA; Messa I; Zuccato BG; Merker B; Erdodi L
    JAMA Neurol; 2018 Jun; 75(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 29532050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary evidence of equivalence of alternate forms of the ImPACT.
    Resch JE; Macciocchi S; Ferrara MS
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2013; 27(8):1265-80. PubMed ID: 24099175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.