142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30957478)
1. Reliability of the different versions of Partin tables in predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eissa A; Elsherbiny A; Zoeir A; Sandri M; Pirola G; Puliatti S; Del Prete C; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Rocco B; Bianchi G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Oct; 71(5):457-478. PubMed ID: 30957478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI Extraprostatic Extension Grade: Accuracy and Clinical Incremental Value in the Assessment of Extraprostatic Cancer.
Xiang JY; Huang XS; Xu JX; Huang RH; Zheng XZ; Xue LM; Liu YL
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():3203965. PubMed ID: 36082151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of prediction models for extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu M; Gao J; Han F; Yin L; Zhang L; Yang Y; Zhang J
Insights Imaging; 2023 Aug; 14(1):140. PubMed ID: 37606802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are Partin tables suitable for Chinese patients with prostate cancer?
Shen XC; Qiu YQ; Zheng YC; Zhang SZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Nov; 125(21):3795-9. PubMed ID: 23106876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decision curve analysis to compare 3 versions of Partin Tables to predict final pathologic stage.
Augustin H; Sun M; Isbarn H; Pummer K; Karakiewicz P
Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 20884254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
Gupta RT; Brown AF; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Madden JF; George DJ; Polascik TJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 27064383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of the updated Partin tables in a cohort of North American men.
Karakiewicz PI; Bhojani N; Capitanio U; Reuther AM; Suardi N; Jeldres C; Pharand D; Péloquin F; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):898-902; discussion 902-3. PubMed ID: 18635222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding multiparametric MRI to the MSKCC and Partin nomograms for primary prostate cancer: Improving local tumor staging?
Jansen BHE; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Oprea-Lager DE; Yska MJ; Lont AP; van Moorselaar RJA; Vis AN
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):181.e1-181.e6. PubMed ID: 30558983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Head-to-head comparison between multiparametric MRI, the partin tables, memorial sloan kettering cancer center nomogram, and CAPRA score in predicting extraprostatic cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Zanelli E; Giannarini G; Cereser L; Zuiani C; Como G; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Valotto C; Ficarra V; Girometti R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1604-1613. PubMed ID: 30957321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample.
Yu JB; Makarov DV; Sharma R; Peschel RE; Partin AW; Gross CP
J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 19913246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External validation of the 2007 and 2001 Partin tables in Irish prostate cancer patients.
Fanning DM; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 20215821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analyses, Clinical Parameters, and Preoperative Nomograms in the Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension.
Majchrzak N; Cieśliński P; Głyda M; Karmelita-Katulska K
Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 11(4):763-774. PubMed ID: 34698089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
Bhojani N; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Haese A; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 18786800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Validation of Models to Predict Pathological Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Regional and National Cohorts.
Ötleş E; Denton BT; Qu B; Murali A; Merdan S; Auffenberg GB; Hiller SC; Lane BR; George AK; Singh K
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):358-366. PubMed ID: 34551595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of accuracy among three generations of Partin tables in a Chinese cohort.
Xiao WJ; Ye DW; Yao XD; Zhang SL; Dai B; Wang CF; Wang J; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu Y; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG; Qin XJ; Lin GW
Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5619-24. PubMed ID: 21504650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
