These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30957582)
1. An evaluation of the Sennheiser HDA 280-CL circumaural headphone for use in audiometric testing. Folkeard P; Hawkins M; Scollie S; Sheikh B; Parsa V Int J Audiol; 2019 Jul; 58(7):427-433. PubMed ID: 30957582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Affordable headphones for accessible screening audiometry: An evaluation of the Sennheiser HD202 II supra-aural headphone. Van der Aerschot M; Swanepoel de W; Mahomed-Asmail F; Myburgh HC; Eikelboom RH Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):616-22. PubMed ID: 27610920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for Sennheiser HDA 280 supra-aural audiometric earphones in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8000 Hz. Poulsen T; Oakley S Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 19842802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry. Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability. Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The equivalent threshold sound pressure levels and test-retest threshold variability of a consumer-grade insert earphone fitted with stock, foam, and otoacoustic emission probe ear tips. Seluakumaran K; Kamal Azizi A; Kulasegarah J Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):551-559. PubMed ID: 37139683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone and Etymotic Research ER-2 insert earphone in the frequency range 125 Hz to 16 kHz. Han LA; Poulsen T Scand Audiol; 1998; 27(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9638829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. One-eartip solution for pure-tone audiometry and acoustic immittance measurements: using insert earphone with an immittance probe ear tip. Ramatsoma H; Koekemoer D; Clark JL; Malan K Int J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 61(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 34120555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing. Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5. Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone. Frank T Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 11324845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing. Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability. Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure. Rodriguez AI; Thomas MLA; Janky KL Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 29870520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reference hearing threshold levels for short duration signals. Poulsen T; Legarth SV Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):665-74. PubMed ID: 18923987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold. Berger EH; Killion MC J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones. Schmuziger N; Probst R; Smurzynski J Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15064657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold. Berger EH; Kerivan JE J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]