100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30957596)
21. Cesarean section with relative indications versus spontaneous vaginal delivery: short-term outcomes of maternofetal health.
Arikan I; Barut A; Harma M; Harma IM; Gezer S; Ulubasoglu H
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 23157026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Point-of-care HIV viral load in pregnant women without prenatal care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Avram CM; Greiner KS; Tilden E; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):265.e1-265.e9. PubMed ID: 31229430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Low risk pregnancies after a cesarean section: Determinants of trial of labor and its failure.
Lehmann S; Baghestan E; Børdahl PE; Irgens LM; Rasmussen S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226894. PubMed ID: 31929542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Confirmed severe maternal morbidity is associated with high rate of preterm delivery.
Kilpatrick SJ; Abreo A; Gould J; Greene N; Main EK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):233.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26899903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002.
Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
Birth; 2004 Mar; 31(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15015987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of maternal obesity, age, pre-eclampsia and insulin dependent diabetes on severe maternal morbidity by mode of delivery-a register-based cohort study.
Pallasmaa N; Ekblad U; Gissler M; Alanen A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Feb; 291(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 25115277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Zipori Y; Grunwald O; Ginsberg Y; Beloosesky R; Weiner Z
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):191.e1-191.e7. PubMed ID: 30616966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Length of stay after childbirth in India: a comparative study of public and private health institutions.
Kumar P; Dhillon P
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Mar; 20(1):181. PubMed ID: 32293327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity.
Hibbard JU; Ismail MA; Wang Y; Te C; Karrison T; Ismail MA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3. PubMed ID: 11408854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.
Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Neonatal and Maternal Short-Term Outcome Parameters in Instrument-Assisted Vaginal Delivery Compared to Second Stage Cesarean Section in Labour: A Retrospective 11-Year Analysis.
Polkowski M; Kuehnle E; Schippert C; Kundu S; Hillemanns P; Staboulidou I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 28222428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Israel perinatal census.
Mor-Yosef S; Samueloff A; Schenker JG
Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jun; 18(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 1503538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor accrues with multiple subsequent vaginal deliveries.
Wymer KM; Shih YC; Plunkett BA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):56.e1-56.e12. PubMed ID: 24487008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.
Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Value-based care in obstetrics: comparison between vaginal birth and caesarean section.
Negrini R; da Silva Ferreira RD; Guimarães DZ
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Apr; 21(1):333. PubMed ID: 33902486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Outcome of labour in African short women.
Megafu U; Okunna EU; Ifeadike V
Trop J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988; 1(1):85-6. PubMed ID: 12179279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A cluster-randomized trial to reduce caesarean delivery rates in Quebec: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Johri M; Ng ESW; Bermudez-Tamayo C; Hoch JS; Ducruet T; Chaillet N
BMC Med; 2017 May; 15(1):96. PubMed ID: 28528578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors Associated with Trial of Labour and Mode of Delivery in Robson Group 5: A Select Group of Women With Previous Caesarean Section.
Smithies M; Woolcott CG; Brock JK; Maguire B; Allen VM
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jun; 40(6):704-711. PubMed ID: 29503254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Vaginal delivery versus caesarean section in preterm breech delivery: a systematic review.
Bergenhenegouwen LA; Meertens LJ; Schaaf J; Nijhuis JG; Mol BW; Kok M; Scheepers HC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jan; 172():1-6. PubMed ID: 24199680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
