These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30958124)

  • 21. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Why do ovigerous females approach courting males? Female preferences and sensory biases in a fiddler crab.
    Chou CC; Backwell PR
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Aug; 6(15):5473-8. PubMed ID: 27551397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin.
    Rosenthal GG; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2022 Jan; 375(6578):eabi6308. PubMed ID: 35050648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Divergence of a speciation trait through artificial selection: Insights into constraints, by-product effects and sexual isolation.
    Yukilevich R; LaGraff JT
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Feb; 36(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 36576691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
    Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
    Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Male rainbow darters (Etheostoma caeruleum) prefer larger conspecific females.
    Soudry O; Kaira H; Parsa S; Mendelson T
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jan; 170():104013. PubMed ID: 31751600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.
    Fitzpatrick CL; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 27804119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Describing mate preference functions and other function-valued traits.
    Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD; Gray DA; Höbel G; Rebar D; Reichert MS; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 28556474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Leader preference in Neoconocephalus ensiger katydids: a female preference for a nonheritable male trait.
    Murphy MA; Gerhardt HC; Schul J
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Dec; 30(12):2222-2229. PubMed ID: 28976614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When Do Opposites Attract? A Model Uncovering the Evolution of Disassortative Mating.
    Maisonneuve L; Beneteau T; Joron M; Smadi C; Llaurens V
    Am Nat; 2021 Nov; 198(5):625-641. PubMed ID: 34648401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sexual selection, phenotypic plasticity and female reproductive output.
    Fox RJ; Fromhage L; Jennions MD
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180184. PubMed ID: 30966965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.