These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30958126)

  • 1. Bayesian and parsimony approaches reconstruct informative trees from simulated morphological datasets.
    Smith MR
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180632. PubMed ID: 30958126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Parry L; Tanner AR; Tarver JE; Fleming J; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of maximum parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction using empirical morphological data.
    Schrago CG; Aguiar BO; Mello B
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 31(10):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 29957887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees.
    Sansom RS; Choate PG; Keating JN; Randle E
    Biol Lett; 2018 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 29925561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertain-tree: discriminating among competing approaches to the phylogenetic analysis of phenotype data.
    Puttick MN; O'Reilly JE; Tanner AR; Fleming JF; Clark J; Holloway L; Lozano-Fernandez J; Parry LA; Tarver JE; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jan; 284(1846):. PubMed ID: 28077778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphological Phylogenetics Evaluated Using Novel Evolutionary Simulations.
    Keating JN; Sansom RS; Sutton MD; Knight CG; Garwood RJ
    Syst Biol; 2020 Sep; 69(5):897-912. PubMed ID: 32073641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probabilistic methods surpass parsimony when assessing clade support in phylogenetic analyses of discrete morphological data.
    O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Pisani D; Donoghue PCJ
    Palaeontology; 2018 Jan; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 29398726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology.
    Goloboff PA; Torres A; Arias JS
    Cladistics; 2018 Aug; 34(4):407-437. PubMed ID: 34649370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species trees from consensus single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data: Testing phylogenetic approaches with simulated and empirical data.
    Schmidt-Lebuhn AN; Aitken NC; Chuah A
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Nov; 116():192-201. PubMed ID: 28743644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Parsimony-Guided Tree Proposals to Accelerate Convergence in Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference.
    Zhang C; Huelsenbeck JP; Ronquist F
    Syst Biol; 2020 Sep; 69(5):1016-1032. PubMed ID: 31985810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular phylogeny of the carnivora (mammalia): assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships.
    Flynn JJ; Finarelli JA; Zehr S; Hsu J; Nedbal MA
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):317-37. PubMed ID: 16012099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Performance of Probabilistic Algorithms for Phylogenetic Analysis of Big Morphological Datasets: A Simulation Study.
    Vernygora OV; Simões TR; Campbell EO
    Syst Biol; 2020 Nov; 69(6):1088-1105. PubMed ID: 32191335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
    Pohle A; Kröger B; Warnock RCM; King AH; Evans DH; Aubrechtová M; Cichowolski M; Fang X; Klug C
    BMC Biol; 2022 Apr; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 35421982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of Parsimony, Likelihood, and Bayesian approaches.
    Leaché AD; Reeder TW
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):44-68. PubMed ID: 11943092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which morphological characters are influential in a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis? Examples from the earliest osteichthyans.
    King B
    Biol Lett; 2019 Jul; 15(7):20190288. PubMed ID: 31311486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handling Logical Character Dependency in Phylogenetic Inference: Extensive Performance Testing of Assumptions and Solutions Using Simulated and Empirical Data.
    Simões TR; Vernygora OV; de Medeiros BAS; Wright AM
    Syst Biol; 2023 Jun; 72(3):662-680. PubMed ID: 36773019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of tree-building methods using a morphological dataset and a well-supported Hexapoda phylogeny.
    Francisco Barbosa F; Mermudes JRM; Russo CAM
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16706. PubMed ID: 38213769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collapsing dubiously resolved gene-tree branches in phylogenomic coalescent analyses.
    Simmons MP; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2021 May; 158():107092. PubMed ID: 33545272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurate phylogenetic tree reconstruction from quartets: a heuristic approach.
    Reaz R; Bayzid MS; Rahman MS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104008. PubMed ID: 25117474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian analysis using a simple likelihood model outperforms parsimony for estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    Wright AM; Hillis DM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109210. PubMed ID: 25279853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.