These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30958253)

  • 41. Multiple parasites are driving major histocompatibility complex polymorphism in the wild.
    Wegner KM; Reusch TB; Kalbe M
    J Evol Biol; 2003 Mar; 16(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 14635861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sexual isolation promotes divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback.
    Berner D; Ammann M; Spencer E; Rüegg A; Lüscher D; Moser D
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Feb; 30(2):401-411. PubMed ID: 27862535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Odour signals major histocompatibility complex genotype in an Old World monkey.
    Setchell JM; Vaglio S; Abbott KM; Moggi-Cecchi J; Boscaro F; Pieraccini G; Knapp LA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jan; 278(1703):274-80. PubMed ID: 20685707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Major histocompatibility complex variation and mate choice in a lekking bird, the great snipe (Gallinago media).
    Ekblom R; Saether SA; Grahn M; Fiske P; Kålås JA; Höglund J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Dec; 13(12):3821-8. PubMed ID: 15548294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does paternal care influence mate preference? Male and female mating behavior in Threespine Stickleback ecotypes that differ markedly in parental care.
    Corney RH; Weir LK
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e9953. PubMed ID: 36998604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Conspicuous female ornamentation and tests of male mate preference in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
    Wright DS; Pierotti ME; Rundle HD; McKinnon JS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120723. PubMed ID: 25806520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Females sample more males at high nesting densities, but ultimately obtain less attractive mates.
    Tinghitella RM; Stehle C; Boughman JW
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 15():200. PubMed ID: 26385337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Role of the iridescent eye in stickleback female mate choice.
    Flamarique IN; Bergstrom C; Cheng CL; Reimchen TE
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Aug; 216(Pt 15):2806-12. PubMed ID: 23580716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. House sparrows do not exhibit a preference for the scent of potential partners with different MHC-I diversity and genetic distances.
    Amo L; Amo de Paz G; Kabbert J; Machordom A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278892. PubMed ID: 36542616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Arms races, ornaments and fragrant genes: the dilemma of mate choice in fishes.
    Milinski M
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2014 Oct; 46 Pt 4():567-72. PubMed ID: 25152201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Exploring local immunological adaptation of two stickleback ecotypes by experimental infection and transcriptome-wide digital gene expression analysis.
    Lenz TL; Eizaguirre C; Rotter B; Kalbe M; Milinski M
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(3):774-86. PubMed ID: 22971109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can MHC-assortative partner choice promote offspring diversity? A new combination of MHC-dependent behaviours among sexes in a highly successful invasive mammal.
    Santos PSC; Michler FU; Sommer S
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Apr; 26(8):2392-2404. PubMed ID: 28141891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans.
    Wedekind C; Seebeck T; Bettens F; Paepke AJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 1995 Jun; 260(1359):245-9. PubMed ID: 7630893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessing reproductive isolation using a contact zone between parapatric lake-stream stickleback ecotypes.
    Hanson D; Moore JS; Taylor EB; Barrett RD; Hendry AP
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Dec; 29(12):2491-2501. PubMed ID: 27633750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of lighting environment on social preferences in sticklebacks from two different photic habitats. II. Shoaling and mate preferences of lab-bred fishes.
    Hiermes M; Marder MB; Reher S; Rick IP; Vitt S; Bakker TCM
    Curr Zool; 2021 Jun; 67(3):309-319. PubMed ID: 34616923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mate choice, sexual imprinting, and speciation: a test of a one-allele isolating mechanism in sympatric sticklebacks.
    Albert AY
    Evolution; 2005 Apr; 59(4):927-31. PubMed ID: 15926703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Color signaling in conspicuous red sticklebacks: do ultraviolet signals surpass others?
    Rick IP; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 8():189. PubMed ID: 18593461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Major histocompatibility complex-associated odour preferences and human mate choice: near and far horizons.
    Havlíček J; Winternitz J; Roberts SC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jun; 375(1800):20190260. PubMed ID: 32306884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.