372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30958738)
21. Assessing the relationship between statin use and oncologic outcomes among men electing active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.
Nyame YA; Wilkins L; Greene DJ; Ganesan V; Dai C; Almassi N; Stephenson AJ; Gong M; Berglund R; Klein EA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):617-623. PubMed ID: 30996285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression in Active Surveillance Patients with Bilateral Disease Detected by Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Fusion and Systematic Biopsy.
Williams C; Khondakar NR; Daneshvar MA; O'Connor LP; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Yerram NK; Egan J; Gurram S; Rompré-Brodeur A; Webster BR; Owens-Walton J; Parnes H; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1157-1165. PubMed ID: 34181465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. African-American men with low-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in an equal-access health care system: implications for active surveillance.
Deka R; Parsons JK; Simpson DR; Riviere P; Nalawade V; Vitzthum LK; Kader AK; Kane CJ; Rock CS; Murphy JD; Rose BS
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(4):581-588. PubMed ID: 32327702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perera M; Jibara G; Tin AL; Haywood S; Sjoberg DD; Benfante NE; Carlsson SV; Eastham JA; Laudone V; Touijer KA; Fine S; Scardino PT; Vickers AJ; Ehdaie B
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):662-668. PubMed ID: 36566100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Delayed radical prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance is not associated with the use of secondary treatments compared with immediate prostatectomy.
Arcot R; Cher ML; Qi J; Linsell SM; Dunn RL; George AK; Montie JE; Ginsburg KB;
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 34855239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis.
Reese AC; Landis P; Han M; Epstein JI; Carter HB
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2033-8. PubMed ID: 23680308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes.
Hussein AA; Welty CJ; Ameli N; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Porten SP; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25623742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does the Visibility of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer on Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Impact Clinical Outcomes?
Deniffel D; Salinas E; Ientilucci M; Evans AJ; Fleshner N; Ghai S; Hamilton R; Roberts A; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Haider MA; Perlis N
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1187-1194. PubMed ID: 32496160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does Early Prostate Specific Antigen Doubling Time after Radical Prostatectomy, Calculated Prior to Prostate Specific Antigen Recurrence, Correlate with Prostate Cancer Outcomes? A Report from the SEARCH Database Group.
Teeter AE; Griffin K; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):713-718. PubMed ID: 28870860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Clinical Significance of Multiple Negative Surveillance Prostate Biopsies for Men on Active Surveillance-Does Cancer Vanish or Simply Hide?
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; de la Calle C; Shoemaker J; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 33198555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer With Extraprostatic Extension Treated With Radical Prostatectomy.
Rezaee ME; Pallauf M; Fletcher SA; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Cornelia Ding CK; Epstein JI; Allaf ME; Trock BJ; Singla N
J Urol; 2024 Mar; 211(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 38109699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pathological Outcome following Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Specific Antigen Greater than 10 ng/ml and Histologically Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer.
Yu J; Kwon YS; Kim S; Han CS; Farber N; Kim J; Byun SS; Kim WJ; Jeon SS; Kim IY
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1464-1470. PubMed ID: 26608903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Grade Group Underestimation in Prostate Biopsy: Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Candidates for Active Surveillance.
Audenet F; Rozet F; Resche-Rigon M; Bernard R; Ingels A; Prapotnich D; Sanchez-Salas R; Galiano M; Barret E; Cathelineau X
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e907-e913. PubMed ID: 28522288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Filippou P; Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Perez N; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 26138041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Questioning the Status Quo: Should Gleason Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer be Considered a "Negative Core" in Pre-Radical Prostatectomy Risk Nomograms? An International Multicenter Analysis.
Leong JY; Herrera-Caceres JO; Goldberg H; Tham E; Teplitsky S; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Fleshner NE; Tilki D; Chandrasekar T
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():102-107. PubMed ID: 31705947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
