These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30959268)

  • 1. Docking software performance in protein-glycosaminoglycan systems.
    Uciechowska-Kaczmarzyk U; Chauvot de Beauchene I; Samsonov SA
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jul; 90():42-50. PubMed ID: 30959268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational analysis of interactions in structurally available protein-glycosaminoglycan complexes.
    Samsonov SA; Pisabarro MT
    Glycobiology; 2016 Aug; 26(8):850-861. PubMed ID: 27496767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PSI-DOCK: towards highly efficient and accurate flexible ligand docking.
    Pei J; Wang Q; Liu Z; Li Q; Yang K; Lai L
    Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):934-46. PubMed ID: 16395666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sense and simplicity in HADDOCK scoring: Lessons from CASP-CAPRI round 1.
    Vangone A; Rodrigues JP; Xue LC; van Zundert GC; Geng C; Kurkcuoglu Z; Nellen M; Narasimhan S; Karaca E; van Dijk M; Melquiond AS; Visscher KM; Trellet M; Kastritis PL; Bonvin AM
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):417-423. PubMed ID: 27802573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1441-1458. PubMed ID: 29890081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advances in Docking.
    Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmarking of different molecular docking methods for protein-peptide docking.
    Agrawal P; Singh H; Srivastava HK; Singh S; Kishore G; Raghava GPS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 19(Suppl 13):426. PubMed ID: 30717654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
    Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
    Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New additions to the ClusPro server motivated by CAPRI.
    Vajda S; Yueh C; Beglov D; Bohnuud T; Mottarella SE; Xia B; Hall DR; Kozakov D
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):435-444. PubMed ID: 27936493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GeauxDock: A novel approach for mixed-resolution ligand docking using a descriptor-based force field.
    Ding Y; Fang Y; Feinstein WP; Ramanujam J; Koppelman DM; Moreno J; Brylinski M; Jarrell M
    J Comput Chem; 2015 Oct; 36(27):2013-26. PubMed ID: 26250822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling large protein-glycosaminoglycan complexes using a fragment-based approach.
    Samsonov SA; Zacharias M; Chauvot de Beauchene I
    J Comput Chem; 2019 May; 40(14):1429-1439. PubMed ID: 30768805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.
    Grudinin S; Kadukova M; Eisenbarth A; Marillet S; Cazals F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):791-804. PubMed ID: 27718029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.