These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30961456)

  • 1. Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment, again: Examining demand characteristics in the guard orientation.
    Bartels J
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(6):780-790. PubMed ID: 30961456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.
    Le Texier T
    Am Psychol; 2019 Oct; 74(7):823-839. PubMed ID: 31380664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Burnout and victimisation: impact of inmates' aggression towards prison guards].
    Boudoukha AH; Hautekeete M; Abdellaoui S; Groux W; Garay D
    Encephale; 2011 Sep; 37(4):284-92. PubMed ID: 21981889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty?
    Carnahan T; McFarland S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 May; 33(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 17440210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persistent dispositionalism in interactionist clothing: fundamental attribution error in explaining prison abuse.
    Haney C; Zimbardo PG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):807-14; author reply 815-8. PubMed ID: 19398589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Philip G. Zimbardo on his career and the Stanford Prison Experiment's 40th anniversary.
    Drury S; Hutchens SA; Shuttlesworth DE; White CL
    Hist Psychol; 2012 May; 15(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 22849005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impulsivity, attribution and prison bullying: bully-category and perpetrator-victim mutuality.
    Holland D; Ireland JL; Muncer S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 19211144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promoting gender responsive support for women inmates: a case study from inside a prison.
    Wendt S; Fraser H
    Int J Prison Health; 2019 Jun; 15(2):126-137. PubMed ID: 31172854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rethinking the nature of cruelty: The role of identity leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment.
    Haslam SA; Reicher SD; Van Bavel JJ
    Am Psychol; 2019 Oct; 74(7):809-822. PubMed ID: 31380665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stressing the group: social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress.
    Haslam SA; Reicher S
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1037-52. PubMed ID: 16953766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Psychopathology of violence in prisons].
    Barreau P
    Soins Psychiatr; 2016; (303):20-3. PubMed ID: 26948194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Debate around leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020).
    Reicher SD; Van Bavel JJ; Haslam SA
    Am Psychol; 2020 Apr; 75(3):406-407. PubMed ID: 32250145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: with special reference to the Stanford Prison Experiment.
    Zimbardo PG
    Cognition; 1973; 2(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 11662069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of male and female prisoners involved in bullying behavior.
    Ireland JL; Archer J; Power CL
    Aggress Behav; 2007; 33(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 17444528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developing an attitude towards bullying scale for prisoners: structural analyses across adult men, young adults and women prisoners.
    Ireland JL; Power CL; Bramhall S; Flowers C
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2009; 19(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 19172637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working with women prisoners who seriously harm themselves: ratings of staff expressed emotion (EE).
    Moore E; Andargachew S; Taylor PJ
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2011 Feb; 21(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 21259370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prison staff and women prisoner's views on self-harm; their implications for service delivery and development: A qualitative study.
    Kenning C; Cooper J; Short V; Shaw J; Abel K; Chew-Graham C
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2010 Oct; 20(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 20603816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychosocial influences on prisoner suicide: a case-control study of near-lethal self-harm in women prisoners.
    Marzano L; Hawton K; Rivlin A; Fazel S
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Mar; 72(6):874-83. PubMed ID: 21345561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The past and future of U.S. prison policy. Twenty-five years after the Stanford prison experiment.
    Haney C; Zimbardo P
    Am Psychol; 1998 Jul; 53(7):709-27. PubMed ID: 9699456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring direct and indirect aggression: behavior of is there a response bias?
    Gregoski M; Malone WA; Richardson DS
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Oct; 97(2):563-6. PubMed ID: 16342585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.