354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30962169)
1. Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: Technical aspects and first results.
Vourtsis A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):579-592. PubMed ID: 30962169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts.
Kim SH; Kim HH; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 31920025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications.
Zanotel M; Bednarova I; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Girometti R; Zuiani C
Radiol Med; 2018 Jan; 123(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 28849324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts.
Drukker K; Horsch KJ; Pesce LL; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 23601952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of ABUS as an Alternative to Handheld Ultrasound for Response Control in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment.
Hatzipanagiotou ME; Huber D; Gerthofer V; Hetterich M; Ripoll BR; Ortmann O; Seitz S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Feb; 22(2):e142-e146. PubMed ID: 34219020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data.
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21498319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-rater reliability and double reading analysis of an automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound system: comparison of two independent examiners.
Maier A; Heil J; Lauer A; Harcos A; Schaefgen B; von Au A; Spratte J; Riedel F; Rauch G; Hennigs A; Domschke C; Schott S; Rom J; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Golatta M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Sep; 296(3):571-582. PubMed ID: 28748340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lesion Segmentation in Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound: Volumetric Analysis.
Agarwal R; Diaz O; Lladó X; Gubern-Mérida A; Vilanova JC; Martí R
Ultrason Imaging; 2018 Mar; 40(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 29182056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
