These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30962412)
21. Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang Y; Ju J; Wu J J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Jun; 18(1):403. PubMed ID: 37269002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Locking stand-alone cages versus anterior plate constructs in single-level fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nambiar M; Phan K; Cunningham JE; Yang Y; Turner PL; Mobbs R Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2258-2266. PubMed ID: 28283840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Miao J; Shen Y; Kuang Y; Yang L; Wang X; Chen Y; Chen D J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Jul; 26(5):E193-7. PubMed ID: 23168389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Lee CK; Shin DA; Yi S; Kim KN; Shin HC; Yoon DH; Ha Y J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 26431070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can segmental mobility be increased by cervical arthroplasty? Chang HK; Chang CC; Tu TH; Wu JC; Huang WC; Fay LY; Chang PY; Wu CL; Cheng H Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb; 42(2):E3. PubMed ID: 28142280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study. Shi S; Liu ZD; Li XF; Qian L; Zhong GB; Chen FJ Spine J; 2015 Sep; 15(9):1973-80. PubMed ID: 25912505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes. Lau D; Chou D; Mummaneni PV J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 26091438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multilevel Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Devices: Analysis of Safety and Feasibility, with Focus on Sagittal Alignment and Impact on Clinical Outcome: Single-Institution Experience and Review of Literature. Albanese V; Certo F; Visocchi M; Barbagallo GMV World Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 106():724-735. PubMed ID: 28625909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion. Barsa P; Suchomel P Eur Spine J; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1395-400. PubMed ID: 17221174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile versus stand-alone cages for two-level cervical spondylosis: A retrospective cohort study. Mu G; Chen H; Fu H; Wang S; Lu H; Yi X; Li C; Yue L; Sun H Front Surg; 2022; 9():1002744. PubMed ID: 36406351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the effectiveness of zero-profile device and plate cage construct in the treatment of one-level cervical disc degenerative disease combined with moderate to severe paraspinal muscle degeneration. Abudouaini H; Xu H; Yang J; Yi M; Lin K; Wang S Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1283795. PubMed ID: 38125794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion. Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between zero-profile spacer and plate with cage in the treatment of single level cervical spondylosis. Lan T; Lin JZ; Hu SY; Yang XJ; Chen Y J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2018; 31(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 29171978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcomes Evaluation of Zero-Profile Devices Compared to Stand-Alone PEEK Cages for the Treatment of Three- and Four-Level Cervical Disc Disease. Gerszten PC; Paschel E; Mashaly H; Sabry H; Jalalod'din H; Saoud K Cureus; 2016 Sep; 8(9):e775. PubMed ID: 27738574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stand-alone cervical polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage (cervios) for single to two-level degenerative disc disease. Iampreechakul P; Srisawat C; Tirakotai W J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Feb; 94(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 21534365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. Hwang SL; Lin CL; Lieu AS; Lee KS; Kuo TH; Hwang YF; Su YF; Howng SL J Neurosurg Spine; 2004 Sep; 1(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 15347001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Clinical outcome of mid-term follow-up of anterior cervical non-fusion surgery versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis]. Guan L; Wang WL; Hai Y; Liu YZ; Chen XL; Chen L Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 96(25):1991-6. PubMed ID: 27470956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Prospective Study with Cage-Only or Cage-with-Plate Fixation in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion of One and Two Levels. Kim SY; Yoon SH; Kim D; Oh CH; Oh S J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2017 Nov; 60(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 29142629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes of cervical degenerative disc disease treated by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking fusion cage. Zhang B; Jiang YZ; Song QP; An Y World J Clin Cases; 2022 May; 10(15):4776-4784. PubMed ID: 35801046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]