157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30962693)
1. SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume: surrogate image biomarkers of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer.
Lv Y; Wang X; Liang L; Wang L; Lu J
Onco Targets Ther; 2019; 12():2115-2121. PubMed ID: 30962693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between PET/CT images and KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer in Vietnamese patients.
Dan NV; Phuong PC; Thai PV; Nguyen NH; Loi NT; Cong BT
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(4):1480-1486. PubMed ID: 36876696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of
Oner AO; Budak ES; Yıldırım S; Aydın F; Sezer C
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 28697193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between PET/CT parameters and KRAS expression in colorectal cancer.
Chen SW; Chiang HC; Chen WT; Hsieh TC; Yen KY; Chiang SF; Kao CH
Clin Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 39(8):685-9. PubMed ID: 24978328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans and KRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Kawada K; Toda K; Nakamoto Y; Iwamoto M; Hatano E; Chen F; Hasegawa S; Togashi K; Date H; Uemoto S; Sakai Y
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1322-7. PubMed ID: 26135109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Volumetric Metabolic Parameters on Preoperative FDG PET/CT for Predicting Tumor Lymphovascular Invasion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Li C; Tian Y; Shen Y; Wen B; He Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1433-1443. PubMed ID: 33978465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value of the Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of
Yin YX; Xie MZ; Liang XQ; Ye ML; Li JL; Hu BL
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():741612. PubMed ID: 34956868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between KRAS mutation and
Cho A; Jo K; Hwang SH; Lee N; Jung M; Yun M; Hwang HS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1621-1626. PubMed ID: 28161825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive Value of Metabolic Parameters Derived From
Liu H; Ye Z; Yang T; Xie H; Duan T; Li M; Wu M; Song B
Front Immunol; 2021; 12():724464. PubMed ID: 34512653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Mediastinal Tumors Using SUV
Morita T; Tatsumi M; Ishibashi M; Isohashi K; Kato H; Honda O; Shimosegawa E; Tomiyama N; Hatazawa J
Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2017; 5(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 28840135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of CT, FDG PET-CT and serum tumor markers in staging recurrent colorectal cancer.
Caglar M; Yener C; Karabulut E
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Jul; 10(7):993-1002. PubMed ID: 25213271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of
Kaymak ZA; Karahan N; Erdoğan M; Erdemoğlu E; Zihni İ; Şengül SS
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2021 Jun; 30(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 34082509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT texture analysis for the prediction of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer via a machine learning approach.
Taguchi N; Oda S; Yokota Y; Yamamura S; Imuta M; Tsuchigame T; Nagayama Y; Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Shiraishi S; Funama Y; Shinriki S; Miyamoto Y; Baba H; Yamashita Y
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():38-43. PubMed ID: 31439256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT tumor markers outperform MRI-based markers for the prediction of lymph node metastases in primary endometrial cancer.
Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Ytre-Hauge S; Salvesen Ø; Trovik J; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2443-2453. PubMed ID: 32034487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Wu X; Huang Y; Li Y; Wang Q; Wang H; Jiang L
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Sep; 33(9):647-656. PubMed ID: 31165974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pretreatment
He P; Zou Y; Qiu J; Yang T; Peng L; Zhang X
J Oncol; 2021; 2021():6687291. PubMed ID: 34239564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The metabolic parameters based on volume in PET/CT are associated with clinicopathological N stage of colorectal cancer and can predict prognosis.
Kido H; Kato S; Funahashi K; Shibuya K; Sasaki Y; Urita Y; Hori M; Mizumura S
EJNMMI Res; 2021 Sep; 11(1):87. PubMed ID: 34487264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative metabolic tumor volume of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma measured by
Ikeno Y; Seo S; Iwaisako K; Yoh T; Nakamoto Y; Fuji H; Taura K; Okajima H; Kaido T; Sakaguchi S; Uemoto S
J Transl Med; 2018 Apr; 16(1):95. PubMed ID: 29642912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The predictive recurrence value of MTV-s as an 18F-FDG PET/CT index in patients with IIB-IVA cervical cancer.
Deng C; Ding D; Wang M
Postgrad Med; 2021 May; 133(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 33620285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of volume-based 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and correlation with PD-L1 expression in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma.
Wang D; Li Y; Chen X; Li P
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Sep; 100(35):e27100. PubMed ID: 34477147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
