These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30962693)

  • 1. SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume: surrogate image biomarkers of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer.
    Lv Y; Wang X; Liang L; Wang L; Lu J
    Onco Targets Ther; 2019; 12():2115-2121. PubMed ID: 30962693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between PET/CT images and KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer in Vietnamese patients.
    Dan NV; Phuong PC; Thai PV; Nguyen NH; Loi NT; Cong BT
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(4):1480-1486. PubMed ID: 36876696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of
    Oner AO; Budak ES; Yıldırım S; Aydın F; Sezer C
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 28697193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between PET/CT parameters and KRAS expression in colorectal cancer.
    Chen SW; Chiang HC; Chen WT; Hsieh TC; Yen KY; Chiang SF; Kao CH
    Clin Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 39(8):685-9. PubMed ID: 24978328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans and KRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Kawada K; Toda K; Nakamoto Y; Iwamoto M; Hatano E; Chen F; Hasegawa S; Togashi K; Date H; Uemoto S; Sakai Y
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1322-7. PubMed ID: 26135109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of Volumetric Metabolic Parameters on Preoperative FDG PET/CT for Predicting Tumor Lymphovascular Invasion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Li C; Tian Y; Shen Y; Wen B; He Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1433-1443. PubMed ID: 33978465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value of the Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of
    Yin YX; Xie MZ; Liang XQ; Ye ML; Li JL; Hu BL
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():741612. PubMed ID: 34956868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between KRAS mutation and
    Cho A; Jo K; Hwang SH; Lee N; Jung M; Yun M; Hwang HS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1621-1626. PubMed ID: 28161825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive Value of Metabolic Parameters Derived From
    Liu H; Ye Z; Yang T; Xie H; Duan T; Li M; Wu M; Song B
    Front Immunol; 2021; 12():724464. PubMed ID: 34512653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Mediastinal Tumors Using SUV
    Morita T; Tatsumi M; Ishibashi M; Isohashi K; Kato H; Honda O; Shimosegawa E; Tomiyama N; Hatazawa J
    Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol; 2017; 5(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 28840135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of CT, FDG PET-CT and serum tumor markers in staging recurrent colorectal cancer.
    Caglar M; Yener C; Karabulut E
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Jul; 10(7):993-1002. PubMed ID: 25213271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of
    Kaymak ZA; Karahan N; Erdoğan M; Erdemoğlu E; Zihni İ; Şengül SS
    Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2021 Jun; 30(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 34082509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT texture analysis for the prediction of KRAS mutation status in colorectal cancer via a machine learning approach.
    Taguchi N; Oda S; Yokota Y; Yamamura S; Imuta M; Tsuchigame T; Nagayama Y; Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Shiraishi S; Funama Y; Shinriki S; Miyamoto Y; Baba H; Yamashita Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():38-43. PubMed ID: 31439256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    Wu X; Huang Y; Li Y; Wang Q; Wang H; Jiang L
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Sep; 33(9):647-656. PubMed ID: 31165974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pretreatment
    He P; Zou Y; Qiu J; Yang T; Peng L; Zhang X
    J Oncol; 2021; 2021():6687291. PubMed ID: 34239564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The metabolic parameters based on volume in PET/CT are associated with clinicopathological N stage of colorectal cancer and can predict prognosis.
    Kido H; Kato S; Funahashi K; Shibuya K; Sasaki Y; Urita Y; Hori M; Mizumura S
    EJNMMI Res; 2021 Sep; 11(1):87. PubMed ID: 34487264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative metabolic tumor volume of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma measured by
    Ikeno Y; Seo S; Iwaisako K; Yoh T; Nakamoto Y; Fuji H; Taura K; Okajima H; Kaido T; Sakaguchi S; Uemoto S
    J Transl Med; 2018 Apr; 16(1):95. PubMed ID: 29642912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The predictive recurrence value of MTV-s as an 18F-FDG PET/CT index in patients with IIB-IVA cervical cancer.
    Deng C; Ding D; Wang M
    Postgrad Med; 2021 May; 133(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 33620285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of volume-based 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and correlation with PD-L1 expression in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma.
    Wang D; Li Y; Chen X; Li P
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Sep; 100(35):e27100. PubMed ID: 34477147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usefulness of Combined Metabolic-Volumetric Indices of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the Early Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Breast Cancer.
    Im HJ; Kim YK; Kim YI; Lee JJ; Lee WW; Kim SE
    Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Mar; 47(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24895506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.