These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30963806)

  • 1. Flexibility in resizing attentional breadth: Asymmetrical versus symmetrical attentional contraction and expansion costs depends on context.
    Goodhew SC; Plummer AS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2527-2540. PubMed ID: 30963806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When cognitive control harms rather than helps: individuals with high working memory capacity are less efficient at infrequent contraction of attentional breadth.
    Goodhew SC
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1783-1800. PubMed ID: 32356010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resting EEG in alpha and beta bands predicts individual differences in attentional breadth.
    Pitchford B; Arnell KM
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Oct; 75():102803. PubMed ID: 31472420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different deployments of attentional breadth selectively predict UFOV task performance in older adults.
    Wyche NJ; Edwards M; Goodhew SC
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Jun; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 38922541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can training change attentional breadth? Failure to find transfer effects.
    Fang L; Hoorelbeke K; Bruyneel L; Notebaert L; MacLeod C; De Raedt R; Koster EHW
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):520-534. PubMed ID: 28239771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Broad attention does not buffer the impact of emotionally salient stimuli on performance.
    Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Cogn Emot; 2024 May; 38(3):332-347. PubMed ID: 38014823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internet-word compared with daily-word priming reduces attentional scope.
    Peng M; Zhang L; Wen Y; Zhao Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Apr; 238(4):1025-1033. PubMed ID: 32193586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual Differences in the Flexibility of Peripersonal Space.
    Hunley SB; Marker AM; Lourenco SF
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 28219262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Openness to experience predicts eye movement behavior during scene viewing.
    Wyche NJ; Edwards M; Goodhew SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Oct; 86(7):2386-2411. PubMed ID: 39134921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-control and its influence on global/local processing: An investigation of the role of frontal alpha asymmetry and dispositional approach tendencies.
    Pitchford B; Arnell KM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):173-187. PubMed ID: 30353499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Both negative and positive task-irrelevant stimuli contract attentional breadth in individuals with high levels of negative affect.
    Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Mar; 36(2):317-331. PubMed ID: 34843423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical regularities guide the spatial scale of attention.
    Zhao J; Luo Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 27844342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention to object categories: Selection history determines the breadth of attentional tuning during real-world object search.
    Addleman DA; Rajasingh R; Störmer VS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1568-1581. PubMed ID: 38647455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetrical hemisphere activation enhances global-local processing.
    Gable PA; Poole BD; Cook MS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Dec; 83(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 24144929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local-global processing bias is not a unitary individual difference in visual processing.
    Chamberlain R; Van der Hallen R; Huygelier H; Van de Cruys S; Wagemans J
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():247-257. PubMed ID: 28427891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working Memory-Driven Attention in Real-World Search.
    Jung S; Yoon Y; Han SW
    Perception; 2018 Sep; 47(9):966-975. PubMed ID: 30058444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.