These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30963823)

  • 1. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mate Preferences and Choosiness Are Distinct Components of Mate Choice in Eastern Gray Treefrogs (
    Feagles O; Höbel G
    Am Nat; 2022 Oct; 200(4):506-517. PubMed ID: 36150198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Kuczynski MC; Getty T; Gering E
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():29-35. PubMed ID: 27913165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moderately elevated glucocorticoids increase mate choosiness but do not affect sexual proceptivity or preferences in female gray treefrogs.
    Baugh AT; Gall MD; Silver SC; Bee MA
    Horm Behav; 2021 Apr; 130():104950. PubMed ID: 33556376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of choosiness dictates whether search costs of mate choice enhance speciation by sexual selection.
    Yukilevich R; Aoki F
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Aug; 35(8):1045-1059. PubMed ID: 35830473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In your CORT: Corticosterone and its receptors in the brain underlie mate choosiness in female Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Rodriguez-Santiago M; Ruppert A; Gall MD; Hoke K; Bee MA; Baugh AT
    Horm Behav; 2024 Mar; 159():105477. PubMed ID: 38245919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.
    Etienne L; Rousset F; Godelle B; Courtiol A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140190. PubMed ID: 24789896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection.
    Brooks R; Endler JA
    Evolution; 2001 Aug; 55(8):1644-55. PubMed ID: 11580024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of age-specific choosiness and reproductive isolation in a model with overlapping generations.
    Cotto O; Servedio MR; Day T
    Evolution; 2022 Feb; 76(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 34877658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
    McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluctuating Dynamics of Mate Availability Promote the Evolution of Flexible Choosiness in Both Sexes.
    Chevalier L; Labonne J; Galipaud M; Dechaume-Moncharmont FX
    Am Nat; 2020 Dec; 196(6):730-742. PubMed ID: 33211564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of age-specific choosiness when mating.
    Cotto O; Day T
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):477-485. PubMed ID: 33314385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Evolution of Mutual Mate Choice under Direct Benefits.
    Courtiol A; Etienne L; Feron R; Godelle B; Rousset F
    Am Nat; 2016 Nov; 188(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 27788341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Describing mate preference functions and other function-valued traits.
    Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD; Gray DA; Höbel G; Rebar D; Reichert MS; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 28556474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.