These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30964856)

  • 1. Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?
    Piper SK; Grittner U; Rex A; Riedel N; Fischer F; Nadon R; Siegerink B; Dirnagl U
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(4):e3000188. PubMed ID: 30964856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aggregate and individual replication probability within an explicit model of the research process.
    Miller J; Schwarz W
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):337-60. PubMed ID: 21534683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 32321438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?
    Pawel S; Heyard R; Micheloud C; Held L
    Elife; 2024 May; 12():. PubMed ID: 38739437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic approach to initial data analysis is good research practice.
    Huebner M; Vach W; le Cessie S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jan; 151(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 26602896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size.
    Lazic SE
    Lab Anim; 2018 Dec; 52(6):621-629. PubMed ID: 29629616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.
    Etz A; Vandekerckhove J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149794. PubMed ID: 26919473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research.
    Kelter R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):171. PubMed ID: 34404344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significance, Errors, Power, and Sample Size: The Blocking and Tackling of Statistics.
    Mascha EJ; Vetter TR
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Feb; 126(2):691-698. PubMed ID: 29346210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Null hypothesis significance testing and effect sizes: can we 'effect' everything … or … anything?
    Lovell DP
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2020 Apr; 51():68-77. PubMed ID: 31948894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How large should the next study be? Predictive power and sample size requirements for replication studies.
    van Zwet EW; Goodman SN
    Stat Med; 2022 Jul; 41(16):3090-3101. PubMed ID: 35396714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To P or Not to P: Backing Bayesian Statistics.
    Buchinsky FJ; Chadha NK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 157(6):915-918. PubMed ID: 29192853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian prediction intervals for assessing P-value variability in prospective replication studies.
    Vsevolozhskaya O; Ruiz G; Zaykin D
    Transl Psychiatry; 2017 Dec; 7(12):1271. PubMed ID: 29217835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of alternative approaches for difference, noninferiority, and equivalence testing of normal percentiles.
    Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 32169043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why the p Value Alone Is Not Enough: The Need for Confidence Intervals in Plastic Surgery Research.
    Samargandi OA; Al-Taha M; Moran K; Al Youha S; Bezuhly M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jan; 141(1):152e-162e. PubMed ID: 28938365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Small telescopes: detectability and the evaluation of replication results.
    Simonsohn U
    Psychol Sci; 2015 May; 26(5):559-69. PubMed ID: 25800521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean?
    Maxwell SE; Lau MY; Howard GS
    Am Psychol; 2015 Sep; 70(6):487-98. PubMed ID: 26348332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.