These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30965093)

  • 1. Confirmation bias and misconceptions: Pupillometric evidence for a confirmation bias in misconceptions feedback.
    Sleegers WWA; Proulx T; van Beest I
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jul; 145():76-83. PubMed ID: 30965093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Belief in corrective feedback for common misconceptions: Implications for knowledge revision.
    Rich PR; Van Loon MH; Dunlosky J; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):492-501. PubMed ID: 27762579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention to Peer Feedback Through the Eyes of Adolescents with a History of Anxiety and Healthy Adolescents.
    Rosen D; Price RB; Ladouceur CD; Siegle GJ; Hutchinson E; Nelson EE; Stroud LR; Forbes EE; Ryan ND; Dahl RE; Silk JS
    Child Psychiatry Hum Dev; 2019 Dec; 50(6):894-906. PubMed ID: 31028507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pupillometric investigation into the speed-accuracy trade-off in a visuo-motor aiming task.
    Naber M; Murphy P
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13499. PubMed ID: 31736089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Don't judge me: Psychophysiological evidence of gender differences to social evaluative feedback.
    Vanderhasselt MA; De Raedt R; Nasso S; Puttevils L; Mueller SC
    Biol Psychol; 2018 May; 135():29-35. PubMed ID: 29510184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are depressive symptoms linked to a reduced pupillary response to novel positive information?-An eye tracking proof-of-concept study.
    Spaeth AM; Koenig S; Everaert J; Glombiewski JA; Kube T
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1253045. PubMed ID: 38464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Teleological reasoning bias is predicted by pupil dynamics: Evidence for the extensive integration account of bias in reasoning.
    Mækelæ MJ; Kreis IV; Pfuhl G
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jun; 61(6):e14532. PubMed ID: 38282116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine-grained versus categorical: Pupil size differentiates between strategies for spatial working memory performance.
    Starc M; Anticevic A; Repovš G
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):724-735. PubMed ID: 28127779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From Positivity to Negativity Bias: Ambiguity Affects the Neurophysiological Signatures of Feedback Processing.
    Gibbons H; Schnuerch R; Stahl J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 26765948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The regulation of positive and negative social feedback: A psychophysiological study.
    Vanderhasselt MA; Remue J; Ng KK; Mueller SC; De Raedt R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):553-63. PubMed ID: 25810280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pupillary responses to syntactic ambiguity of sentences.
    Schluroff M; Zimmermann TE; Freeman RB; Hofmeister K; Lorscheid T; Weber A
    Brain Lang; 1986 Mar; 27(2):322-44. PubMed ID: 3513899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Older and younger adults' revision of health misconceptions.
    Sitzman DM; Rheams J; Babineau AL; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2022 Feb; 30(2):172-189. PubMed ID: 34756161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systems model for pupil size effect. II. Feedback model.
    Krenz WC; Stark L
    Biol Cybern; 1985; 51(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 3995096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Jumping to Conclusions bias, BADE and Feedback Sensitivity in schizophrenia and schizotypy.
    Juárez-Ramos V; Rubio JL; Delpero C; Mioni G; Stablum F; Gómez-Milán E
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 May; 26():133-44. PubMed ID: 24747992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Static and dynamic pupillometry data of healthy individuals.
    Tekin K; Sekeroglu MA; Kiziltoprak H; Doguizi S; Inanc M; Yilmazbas P
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Sep; 101(5):659-665. PubMed ID: 29356077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confirmation bias: why psychiatrists stick to wrong preliminary diagnoses.
    Mendel R; Traut-Mattausch E; Jonas E; Leucht S; Kane JM; Maino K; Kissling W; Hamann J
    Psychol Med; 2011 Dec; 41(12):2651-9. PubMed ID: 21733217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data.
    Mathôt S; Fabius J; Van Heusden E; Van der Stigchel S
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 29330763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Mar; 51(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 24506437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Covariation bias in women with a negative body evaluation: How is it expressed and can it be diminished?
    Alleva JM; Martijn C; Jansen A
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Mar; 50():33-9. PubMed ID: 26000555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative Pupillometry for Detection of Intracranial Pressure Changes During Head-Down Tilt.
    Soeken TA; Alonso A; Grant A; Calvillo E; Gutierrez-Flores B; Clark J; Donoviel D; Bershad EM
    Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2018 Aug; 89(8):717-723. PubMed ID: 30020056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.