These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30965264)

  • 1. Negative emissions technologies: A complementary solution for climate change mitigation.
    Pires JCM
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jul; 672():502-514. PubMed ID: 30965264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atmospheric CO2 capture by algae: Negative carbon dioxide emission path.
    Moreira D; Pires JCM
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 215():371-379. PubMed ID: 27005790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies.
    Smith P
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Mar; 22(3):1315-24. PubMed ID: 26732128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
    Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fighting global warming by greenhouse gas removal: destroying atmospheric nitrous oxide thanks to synergies between two breakthrough technologies.
    Ming T; de Richter R; Shen S; Caillol S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Apr; 23(7):6119-38. PubMed ID: 26805926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the Emergent Climate Change Mitigation Technologies.
    Panepinto D; Riggio VA; Zanetti M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34202431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments.
    Haszeldine RS; Flude S; Johnson G; Scott V
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2018 May; 376(2119):. PubMed ID: 29610379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carbon trading, co-pollutants, and environmental equity: Evidence from California's cap-and-trade program (2011-2015).
    Cushing L; Blaustein-Rejto D; Wander M; Pastor M; Sadd J; Zhu A; Morello-Frosch R
    PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002604. PubMed ID: 29990353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Climate Mitigation Challenge-Where Do We Stand?
    Princiotta FT
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Oct; 71(10):1234-1250. PubMed ID: 34233128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mobile measurements of climate forcing agents: Application to methane emissions from landfill and natural gas compression.
    Jakober CA; Mara SL; Hsu YK; Herner JD
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Apr; 65(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 25947210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Greenhouse gas emissions reduction in different economic sectors: Mitigation measures, health co-benefits, knowledge gaps, and policy implications.
    Gao J; Hou H; Zhai Y; Woodward A; Vardoulakis S; Kovats S; Wilkinson P; Li L; Song X; Xu L; Meng B; Liu X; Wang J; Zhao J; Liu Q
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Sep; 240():683-698. PubMed ID: 29775945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global climate change: the quantifiable sustainability challenge.
    Princiotta FT; Loughlin DH
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Sep; 64(9):979-94. PubMed ID: 25282995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.
    Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking climate change mitigation and coastal eutrophication management through biogas technology: Evidence from a new Danish bioenergy concept.
    Kaspersen BS; Christensen TB; Fredenslund AM; Møller HB; Butts MB; Jensen NH; Kjaer T
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 541():1124-1131. PubMed ID: 26476058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of the Freight Sector in Future Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios.
    Muratori M; Smith SJ; Kyle P; Link R; Mignone BK; Kheshgi HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 51(6):3526-3533. PubMed ID: 28240022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970-2050.
    Bennetzen EH; Smith P; Porter JR
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Feb; 22(2):763-81. PubMed ID: 26451699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chinese cropping systems are a net source of greenhouse gases despite soil carbon sequestration.
    Gao B; Huang T; Ju X; Gu B; Huang W; Xu L; Rees RM; Powlson DS; Smith P; Cui S
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Dec; 24(12):5590-5606. PubMed ID: 30118572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Large uncertainty in carbon uptake potential of land-based climate-change mitigation efforts.
    Krause A; Pugh TAM; Bayer AD; Li W; Leung F; Bondeau A; Doelman JC; Humpenöder F; Anthoni P; Bodirsky BL; Ciais P; Müller C; Murray-Tortarolo G; Olin S; Popp A; Sitch S; Stehfest E; Arneth A
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Jul; 24(7):3025-3038. PubMed ID: 29569788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current available strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in livestock systems: an animal welfare perspective.
    Llonch P; Haskell MJ; Dewhurst RJ; Turner SP
    Animal; 2017 Feb; 11(2):274-284. PubMed ID: 27406001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.