BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30967827)

  • 1. No "Self" Advantage for Audiovisual Speech Aftereffects.
    Modelska M; Pourquié M; Baart M
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():658. PubMed ID: 30967827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluidity in the perception of auditory speech: Cross-modal recalibration of voice gender and vowel identity by a talking face.
    Burgering MA; van Laarhoven T; Baart M; Vroomen J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):957-967. PubMed ID: 31931664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lip-Reading Enables the Brain to Synthesize Auditory Features of Unknown Silent Speech.
    Bourguignon M; Baart M; Kapnoula EC; Molinaro N
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(5):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 31889007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid, generalized adaptation to asynchronous audiovisual speech.
    Van der Burg E; Goodbourn PT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Apr; 282(1804):20143083. PubMed ID: 25716790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The self-advantage in visual speech processing enhances audiovisual speech recognition in noise.
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar BP; Myerson J; Hale S; Sommers MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1048-53. PubMed ID: 25421408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional resources contribute to the perceptual learning of talker idiosyncrasies in audiovisual speech.
    Jesse A; Kaplan E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1006-1019. PubMed ID: 30684204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Adaptation as Induced by Lexical and Audiovisual Context.
    Ullas S; Hausfeld L; Cutler A; Eisner F; Formisano E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 32(11):2145-2158. PubMed ID: 32662723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: a McGurk aftereffect.
    Bertelson P; Vroomen J; De Gelder B
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Nov; 14(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 14629691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories?
    Reinisch E; Wozny DR; Mitterer H; Holt LL
    J Phon; 2014 Jul; 45():91-105. PubMed ID: 24932053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Selective Deficit in Phonetic Recalibration by Text in Developmental Dyslexia.
    Keetels M; Bonte M; Vroomen J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():710. PubMed ID: 29867675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid recalibration of speech perception after experiencing the McGurk illusion.
    Lüttke CS; Pérez-Bellido A; de Lange FP
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Mar; 5(3):170909. PubMed ID: 29657743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual speech recalibration in children.
    van Linden S; Vroomen J
    J Child Lang; 2008 Nov; 35(4):809-22. PubMed ID: 18838013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.
    Uno K; Yokosawa K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21308. PubMed ID: 36494490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multistage audiovisual integration of speech: dissociating identification and detection.
    Eskelund K; Tuomainen J; Andersen TS
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 21188364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence for speech-specific audiovisual integration.
    Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():115-21. PubMed ID: 24291340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MEG Activity in Visual and Auditory Cortices Represents Acoustic Speech-Related Information during Silent Lip Reading.
    Bröhl F; Keitel A; Kayser C
    eNeuro; 2022; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 35728955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence for a self-processing advantage during audiovisual speech integration.
    Treille A; Vilain C; Kandel S; Sato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2867-2876. PubMed ID: 28676921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recalibration of vocal affect by a dynamic face.
    Baart M; Vroomen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1911-1918. PubMed ID: 29696314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.