These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30968328)
1. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry. Luebke J; Bryniok L; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Boehringer D; Reinhard T; Wecker T; Anton A Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2517-2521. PubMed ID: 30968328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry. Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard]. Steinberg J; Mehlan J; Frings A; Druchkiv V; Richard G; Katz T; Linke SJ Ophthalmologe; 2015 Sep; 112(9):770-7. PubMed ID: 25501931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison between Goldmann, Icare Pro and Corvis ST tonometry]. Bañeros-Rojas P; Martinez de la Casa JM; Arribas-Pardo P; Berrozpe-Villabona C; Toro-Utrera P; García-Feijoó J Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):260-4. PubMed ID: 24814401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals. Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Mansoori T; Balakrishna N Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices. Lanza M; Rinaldi M; Carnevale UAG; di Staso S; Sconocchia MB; Costagliola C BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 30176825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST, non-contact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in children with ocular hypertension and related factors. Li HG; Chen YH; Lin F; Li SY; Liu QH; Yin CG; Chen XY; Zhang XJ; Qu Y; Hui YN Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(10):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 37854370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Tonnu PA; Ho T; Newson T; El Sheikh A; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 15965165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers. Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of the Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by the Corvis ST and Reichert 7CR Tonometers in Glaucoma Patients. Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okimoto S PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170206. PubMed ID: 28095506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes. Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different devices to measure the intraocular pressure in thyroid-associated orbitopathy. Kuebler AG; Wiecha C; Reznicek L; Klingenstein A; Halfter K; Priglinger S; Hintschich C Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 257(9):2025-2032. PubMed ID: 31222404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects. Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Latanoprost treatment differentially affects intraocular pressure readings obtained with three different tonometers. Sánchez-Barahona C; Bolívar G; Katsanos A; Teus MA Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1112-e1115. PubMed ID: 31184426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]