BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30969157)

  • 1. Comparison of Different Small Clinical Hematology Laboratory Configurations With Focus on Remote Smear Imaging.
    Stephens L; Bevins NJ; Bengtsson HI; Broome HE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 Oct; 143(10):1234-1245. PubMed ID: 30969157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of a new compact hematology analyzer, the Sysmex pocH-100i.
    Briggs C; Kunka S; Pennaneach C; Forbes L; Machin SJ
    Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(4):225-33. PubMed ID: 14649465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters.
    Petrone J; Jackups R; Eby CS; Shimer G; Anderson J; Frater JL
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 31162809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex pocH-100i automated hematology analyzer.
    Whisler S; Dahlgren C
    Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 16024334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of an automated digital imaging system, Nextslide Digital Review Network, for examination of peripheral blood smears.
    Yu H; Ok CY; Hesse A; Nordell P; Connor D; Sjostedt E; Pechet L; Snyder LM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jun; 136(6):660-7. PubMed ID: 22646275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer Mindray BC-6000.
    Shen Y; Cao J; Zhou Z; Wang Y; Shen Y; He J
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):622-634. PubMed ID: 31286670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance Evaluation of the Mindray BC 6800 Hematology Analyzer and Flag Comparison with the XE-2100 and Manual Microscopy.
    Xiang D; Yue J; Sha C; Ren S; Li M; Wang C
    Clin Lab; 2019 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 30969092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripheral blood film review. The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential.
    Pierre RV
    Clin Lab Med; 2002 Mar; 22(1):279-97. PubMed ID: 11933579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Performance evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 system in WBC differentials].
    Yamamoto T; Tabe Y; Ishii K; Itoh S; Maeno I; Matsumoto K; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
    Rinsho Byori; 2010 Sep; 58(9):884-90. PubMed ID: 20963948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance evaluation of new Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer.
    Woo KS; Jeong IH; An GD; Lim HH; Han JY
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):657-663. PubMed ID: 31271528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Mindray BC-5000 hematology analyzer: a new miniature 5-part WBC differential instrument.
    Xiang D; Yue J; Lan Y; Sha C; Ren S; Li Y; Li M; Wang C
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Oct; 37(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 25944368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated digital cell morphology identification system (CellaVision DM96) is very useful for leukocyte differentials in specimens with qualitative or quantitative abnormalities.
    Park SH; Park CJ; Choi MO; Kim MJ; Cho YU; Jang S; Chi HS
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Oct; 35(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 23286314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.
    Bhuta UM; Ulstein H
    Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance evaluation of the complete blood count and white blood cell differential parameters obtained using a Celltac F automated hematology analyzer.
    Kondo H; Akiyama T; Tatsumi N; Nagai Y
    Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15070212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can automated blood film analysis replace the manual differential? An evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 automated image analysis system.
    Briggs C; Longair I; Slavik M; Thwaite K; Mills R; Thavaraja V; Foster A; Romanin D; Machin SJ
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2009 Feb; 31(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 18177438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Mindray BC-3600 hematology analyzer in a university hospital.
    Shu G; Lu H; Du H; Shi J; Wu G
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Feb; 35(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 22925195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absolute neutrophil counts from automated hematology instruments are accurate and precise even at very low levels.
    Amundsen EK; Urdal P; Hagve TA; Holthe MR; Henriksson CE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 137(6):862-9. PubMed ID: 22586044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology.
    Ruzicka K; Veitl M; Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Schwarzinger I
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Mar; 125(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 11231489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the Sysmex Xe-2100 hematology analyzer in hospital use.
    Nakul-Aquaronne D; Sudaka-Sammarcelli I; Ferrero-Vacher C; Starck B; Bayle J
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2003; 17(4):113-23. PubMed ID: 12784259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
    Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
    Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.