These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30970268)
1. The implementation of RAAF in the OECD QSAR Toolbox. Kuseva C; Schultz TW; Yordanova D; Tankova K; Kutsarova S; Pavlov T; Chapkanov A; Georgiev M; Gissi A; Sobanski T; Mekenyan OG Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Jul; 105():51-61. PubMed ID: 30970268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques. Lamon L; Asturiol D; Richarz A; Joossens E; Graepel R; Aschberger K; Worth A Part Fibre Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 30249272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Building scientific confidence in the development and evaluation of read-across. Patlewicz G; Ball N; Boogaard PJ; Becker RA; Hubesch B Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jun; 72(1):117-33. PubMed ID: 25857293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating lines of evidence from New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to reduce uncertainties in a category based read-across: A case study for repeated dose toxicity. Pestana CB; Firman JW; Cronin MTD Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Mar; 120():104855. PubMed ID: 33359265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity. Schultz TW; Amcoff P; Berggren E; Gautier F; Klaric M; Knight DJ; Mahony C; Schwarz M; White A; Cronin MT Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Aug; 72(3):586-601. PubMed ID: 26003513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Workshop: use of "read-across" for chemical safety assessment under REACH. Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Aptula A; Blackburn K; Hubesch B Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Mar; 65(2):226-8. PubMed ID: 23266660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The OECD QSAR Toolbox Starts Its Second Decade. Schultz TW; Diderich R; Kuseva CD; Mekenyan OG Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():55-77. PubMed ID: 29934887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The predictivity of the -alert performance- functionality of the OECD QSAR-Toolbox (c/w further issues on the predictivity of nonclinical testing). Suarez-Torres JD; Ciangherotti CE; Jimenez-Orozco FA Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Aug; 66():104858. PubMed ID: 32278032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of performance of the profilers provided in the OECD QSAR toolbox for category formation of chemicals. Aljallal MA; Chaudhry Q; Price NR Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18330. PubMed ID: 39112641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uncertainty in QSAR predictions. Sahlin U Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 23614548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The challenge of using read-across within the EU REACH regulatory framework; how much uncertainty is too much? Dipropylene glycol methyl ether acetate, an exemplary case study. Ball N; Bartels M; Budinsky R; Klapacz J; Hays S; Kirman C; Patlewicz G Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Mar; 68(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 24378700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR toolbox automatic workflow for the prediction of the acute toxicity of organic chemicals to fathead minnow. Mombelli E; Pandard P Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jun; 122():104893. PubMed ID: 33587933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of Computational Methods. Patlewicz G; Worth AP; Ball N Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 856():165-187. PubMed ID: 27671722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using chemical categories to fill data gaps in hazard assessment. van Leeuwen K; Schultz TW; Henry T; Diderich B; Veith GD SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(3-4):207-20. PubMed ID: 19544189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated read-across workflow for predicting acute oral toxicity: I. The decision scheme in the QSAR toolbox. Kutsarova S; Mehmed A; Cherkezova D; Stoeva S; Georgiev M; Petkov T; Chapkanov A; Schultz TW; Mekenyan OG Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105015. PubMed ID: 34293429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arguments for considering uncertainty in QSAR predictions in hazard and risk assessments. Sahlin U; Golsteijn L; Iqbal MS; Peijnenburg W Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Mar; 41(1):91-110. PubMed ID: 23614547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toxicological assessment of lower alkyl methacrylate esters by a category approach. Gelbke HP; Ellis-Hutchings R; Müllerschön H; Murphy S; Pemberton M Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Feb; 92():104-127. PubMed ID: 29180022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NAM-supported read-across: From case studies to regulatory guidance in safety assessment. Rovida C; Escher SE; Herzler M; Bennekou SH; Kamp H; Kroese DE; Maslankiewicz L; Moné MJ; Patlewicz G; Sipes N; Van Aerts L; White A; Yamada T; Van de Water B ALTEX; 2021; 38(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 33452529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. QSAR Toolbox - workflow and major functionalities. Dimitrov SD; Diderich R; Sobanski T; Pavlov TS; Chankov GV; Chapkanov AS; Karakolev YH; Temelkov SG; Vasilev RA; Gerova KD; Kuseva CD; Todorova ND; Mehmed AM; Rasenberg M; Mekenyan OG SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 Mar; 27(3):203-219. PubMed ID: 26892800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]