These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30971307)

  • 1. What is the lowest change in cardiac output that transthoracic echocardiography can detect?
    Jozwiak M; Mercado P; Teboul JL; Benmalek A; Gimenez J; Dépret F; Richard C; Monnet X
    Crit Care; 2019 Apr; 23(1):116. PubMed ID: 30971307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.
    Mercado P; Maizel J; Beyls C; Titeca-Beauport D; Joris M; Kontar L; Riviere A; Bonef O; Soupison T; Tribouilloy C; de Cagny B; Slama M
    Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of Common Carotid Artery Blood Flow Parameters With Transthoracic Echocardiographic Cardiac Output for Assessing Fluid Responsiveness After Passive Leg Raising (PLR) Test in Critically Ill Patients.
    Patnaik R; Krishna B; Sampath S
    Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40229. PubMed ID: 37435241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound assessment of volume responsiveness in critically ill surgical patients: Two measurements are better than one.
    Murthi SB; Fatima S; Menne AR; Glaser JJ; Galvagno SM; Biederman S; Fang R; Chen H; Scalea TM
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2017 Mar; 82(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 28030505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients by Using Combined End-Expiratory and End-Inspiratory Occlusions With Echocardiography.
    Jozwiak M; Depret F; Teboul JL; Alphonsine JE; Lai C; Richard C; Monnet X
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Nov; 45(11):e1131-e1138. PubMed ID: 28857907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients.
    Nguyen HB; Banta DP; Stewart G; Kim T; Bansal R; Anholm J; Wittlake WA; Corbett SW
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Jun; 24(3):237-47. PubMed ID: 20563629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bridging the gap: Hybrid cardiac echo in the critically ill.
    Glaser JJ; Cardarelli C; Galvagno S; Scalea TM; Murthi SB
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2016 Nov; 81(5 Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 2015 Military Health System Research Symposium):S157-S161. PubMed ID: 27768664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can bioimpedance cardiography assess hemodynamic response to passive leg raising in critically ill patients: A STROBE-compliant study.
    Li L; Ai Y; Huang L; Ai M; Peng Q; Zhang L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(51):e23764. PubMed ID: 33371141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.
    Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.
    McNamara H; Barclay P; Sharma V
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 25005720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of assessing velocity time integral at different locations across ventricular outflow tracts when calculating cardiac output in neonates.
    Huang J; Singh Y; Adie M; Noori S; Ebrahimi M; Durand M; Cayabyab R; Ramanathan R
    Eur J Pediatr; 2023 Oct; 182(10):4433-4441. PubMed ID: 37490109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of Shock Index with Echocardiographic Parameters in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.
    Tabi M; Padkins M; Burstein B; Younis A; Asher E; Bennett C; Jentzer JC
    J Crit Care; 2024 Feb; 79():154445. PubMed ID: 37890356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of electrical cardiometry for the noninvasive determination of cardiac output before and after lung surgeries compared to transthoracic echocardiography.
    Elgebaly AS; Anwar AG; Fathy SM; Sallam A; Elbarbary Y
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2020; 23(3):288-292. PubMed ID: 32687084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring methods in critically ill children.
    Chaiyakulsil C; Chantra M; Katanyuwong P; Khositseth A; Anantasit N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199203. PubMed ID: 29912937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine learning methods to improve bedside fluid responsiveness prediction in severe sepsis or septic shock: an observational study.
    Bataille B; de Selle J; Moussot PE; Marty P; Silva S; Cocquet P
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Apr; 126(4):826-834. PubMed ID: 33461735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness.
    Slama M; Masson H; Teboul JL; Arnout ML; Susic D; Frohlich E; Andrejak M
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2002 Oct; 283(4):H1729-33. PubMed ID: 12234829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of fluid responsiveness in sepsis: the fluid challenge revisiting (FCREV) study.
    Roger C; Zieleskiewicz L; Demattei C; Lakhal K; Piton G; Louart B; Constantin JM; Chabanne R; Faure JS; Mahjoub Y; Desmeulles I; Quintard H; Lefrant JY; Muller L;
    Crit Care; 2019 May; 23(1):179. PubMed ID: 31097012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale for using the velocity-time integral and the minute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiac output in point-of-care settings.
    Blanco P
    Ultrasound J; 2020 Apr; 12(1):21. PubMed ID: 32318842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography: Investigation of Concordance between the Two Methods for Measurement of the Cardiac Chamber.
    Gürdoğan M; Ustabaşıoğlu FE; Kula O; Korkmaz S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jun; 55(6):. PubMed ID: 31181857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common Carotid Artery Sonography Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Cardiac Output Measurements in Intensive Care Unit Patients.
    Peng QY; Zhang LN; Ai ML; Li L; Hu CH; Zhang YX; Liu W; Feng Q; Zou Y; Ai YH;
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Sep; 36(9):1793-1799. PubMed ID: 28429475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.