These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30972621)

  • 1. Replicate systematic review and meta-analyses on robotic surgery: a quality appraisal and overlap investigation.
    Ji J; Zhang H; Xu D; Zhang T; Kong D; Xiao G; Cao Z; Wang F; Gao X; Sun YH
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):384-395. PubMed ID: 30972621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The methodological quality of robotic surgical meta-analyses needed to be improved: a cross-sectional study.
    Yan P; Yao L; Li H; Zhang M; Xun Y; Li M; Cai H; Lu C; Hu L; Guo T; Liu R; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():20-29. PubMed ID: 30579979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
    Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the Best Evidence Good Enough: Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Meta-Analyses on Depression.
    Zhu Y; Fan L; Zhang H; Wang M; Mei X; Hou J; Shi Z; Shuai Y; Shen Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157808. PubMed ID: 27336624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
    Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Tsujimoto Y; Luo Y; Yamamoto K; So R; Aga M; Matsushima K; Fukuma S; Furukawa TA
    Br J Surg; 2021 Dec; 108(12):1521-1529. PubMed ID: 34791075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of resveratrol: A methodological systematic review.
    Lu C; Ke L; Zhang Q; Deng X; Shang W; Zhao X; Li Y; Xie Y; Wang Z
    Phytother Res; 2024 Jan; 38(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 37767776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.
    Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Yamamoto K; Furukawa TA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017411. PubMed ID: 28827269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing the treatment and management of male infertility.
    Bhambhvani HP; Greenberg DR; Eisenberg ML
    Andrology; 2021 May; 9(3):801-809. PubMed ID: 33432772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang ZW; Cheng J; Liu Z; Ma JC; Li JL; Wang J; Yang KH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008066. PubMed ID: 26644119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hypothyroidism and related diseases: a methodological quality assessment of meta-analysis.
    Tian L; Shao F; Qin Y; Guo Q; Gao C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e024111. PubMed ID: 30928930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.
    Liu D; Jin J; Tian J; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0120911. PubMed ID: 25905713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment and Management Published in the Sexual Medicine Literature.
    Greenberg DR; Richardson MT; Tijerina JD; Bass MB; Eisenberg ML
    J Sex Med; 2019 Mar; 16(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 30773501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of antidepressants effect on low back pain using updated AMSTAR.
    Panahi MH; Mohseni M; Bidhendi Yarandi R; Ramezani Tehrani F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 31973739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews with quality assessment of current evidence.
    Hoshino N; Sakamoto T; Hida K; Sakai Y
    Surg Today; 2019 Jul; 49(7):556-570. PubMed ID: 30635740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological quality of systematic reviews comprising clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery.
    Jacobsen SM; Douglas A; Smith CA; Roberts W; Ottwell R; Oglesby B; Yasler C; Torgerson T; Hartwell M; Vassar M
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Dec; 127(6):905-916. PubMed ID: 34548174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.