210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30972767)
1. Technical Note: Assessing the performance of monthly CBCT image quality QA.
Manger RP; Pawlicki T; Hoisak J; Kim GY
Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 30972767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A framework for automated and streamlined kV cone beam computed tomography image quality assurance: a multi-institutional study.
Ayan AS; Kim G; Whitaker M; Al-Hallaq H; Hsu SH; Woollard J; Roberts DA; Shtraus N; Gao S; Gupta N; Moran JM
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Oct; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34544065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of a prototype rapid kilovoltage x-ray image guidance system designed for a ring shape radiation therapy unit.
Cai B; Laugeman E; Mazur TR; Park JC; Henke LE; Kim H; Hugo GD; Mutic S; Li H
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1355-1370. PubMed ID: 30675902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of visual and semi-automated kilovoltage cone beam CT image QA analysis.
Becerra-Espinosa N; Claps L; Alaei P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14190. PubMed ID: 37937765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CBCT image quality QA: Establishing a quantitative program.
Taneja S; Barbee DL; Rea AJ; Malin M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):215-225. PubMed ID: 33078562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the stability of image-quality parameters of Varian on-board imaging (OBI) and EPID imaging systems.
Stanley DN; Papanikolaou N; Gutierrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5088. PubMed ID: 26103178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absorbed dose and image quality of Varian TrueBeam CBCT compared with OBI CBCT.
Kawahara D; Ozawa S; Nakashima T; Suzuki T; Tsuneda M; Tanaka S; Ohno Y; Murakami Y; Nagata Y
Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1628-1633. PubMed ID: 27923551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the improvement of CBCT image quality for soft tissue-based SRS localization.
Mao W; Gardner SJ; Snyder KC; Wen NW; Zhong H; Li H; Jackson P; Shah M; Chetty IJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):177-184. PubMed ID: 30294838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of imaging performance of megavoltage cone-beam CT over an extended period.
Sumida I; Yamaguchi H; Kizaki H; Yamada Y; Koizumi M; Yoshioka Y; Ogawa K; Kakimoto N; Murakami S; Furukawa S
J Radiat Res; 2014 Jan; 55(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 23979076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective image quality assurance in cone-beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies.
Johnston A; Mahesh M; Uneri A; Rypinski TA; Boone JM; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2424-2443. PubMed ID: 38354310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial application of a geometric QA tool for integrated MV and kV imaging systems on three image guided radiotherapy systems.
Mao W; Speiser M; Medin P; Papiez L; Solberg T; Xing L
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2335-41. PubMed ID: 21776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical evaluation of the cone-beam computed tomography imaging performance of a novel, mobile, gantry-based X-ray system for brachytherapy.
Karius A; Karolczak M; Strnad V; Bert C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13501. PubMed ID: 34905285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comprehensive quality assurance phantom for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP).
Jermoumi M; Korideck H; Bhagwat M; Zygmanski P; Makrigiogos GM; Berbeco RI; Cormack RC; Ngwa W
Phys Med; 2015 Jul; 31(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 25964129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of the stability of image quality parameters of Elekta X-ray volume imager and iViewGT imaging systems.
Stanley DN; Rasmussen K; Kirby N; Papanikolaou N; Gutiérrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 29520938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
