These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30972837)

  • 1. Readability of online breast cancer information.
    Basch CH; MacLean SA; Garcia P; Basch CE
    Breast J; 2019 May; 25(3):562-563. PubMed ID: 30972837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability, content analysis, and racial/ethnic diversity of online living kidney donation information.
    Rodrigue JR; Feranil M; Lang J; Fleishman A
    Clin Transplant; 2017 Sep; 31(9):. PubMed ID: 28640438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
    Surgery; 2014 Aug; 156(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 24953268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery.
    Miles RC; Baird GL; Choi P; Falomo E; Dibble EH; Garg M
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 30694156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Abortion Internet searches. An evaluation with Google Trends in Peru].
    Tejada-Llacsa PJ
    Gac Sanit; 2016; 30(4):319. PubMed ID: 27263027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; MacLean SA; Fera J; Garcia P; Basch CE
    Am J Mens Health; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 29888641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
    Mozafarpour S; Norris B; Borin J; Eisner BH
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):985-992. PubMed ID: 29435639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information Needs and Internet Use of Breast Cancer Survivors in Mexico.
    Villarreal-Garza C; Platas A; Martinez-Cannon BA; Bargalló-Rocha E; Aguilar-González CN; Ortega-Leonard V; Ramos-Elías P; Hidalgo-Carrera J; Soto-Perez-de-Celis E
    Breast J; 2017 May; 23(3):373-375. PubMed ID: 27943486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The readability of online breast cancer risk assessment tools.
    Cortez S; Milbrandt M; Kaphingst K; James A; Colditz G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(1):191-9. PubMed ID: 26475705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acute low back pain information online: an evaluation of quality, content accuracy and readability of related websites.
    Hendrick PA; Ahmed OH; Bankier SS; Chan TJ; Crawford SA; Ryder CR; Welsh LJ; Schneiders AG
    Man Ther; 2012 Aug; 17(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 22464886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients : The Internet as an information source.
    Janssen S; Käsmann L; Fahlbusch FB; Rades D; Vordermark D
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Feb; 194(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 28856383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability and quality of breast reduction on-line resources.
    Kennedy AM; Davidson C; Cronin E; Caulfield R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jan; 72(1):137-171. PubMed ID: 30236875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information.
    Friedman DB; Hoffman-Goetz L
    Health Educ Behav; 2006 Jun; 33(3):352-73. PubMed ID: 16699125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer in the information age: a review of recent developments.
    Helft PR
    Breast Dis; 2004; 21():41-6. PubMed ID: 15687721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cancer-Related Internet Use and Online Social Networking Among Patients in an Early-Phase Clinical Trials Clinic at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.
    George GC; Buford A; Hess K; Piha-Paul SA; Zinner R; Subbiah V; Hinojosa C; Cleeland CS; Meric-Bernstam F; Bernstam EV; Hong DS
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2018 Dec; 2():1-14. PubMed ID: 30652565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options.
    Arif N; Ghezzi P
    Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():6-12. PubMed ID: 29040893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
    Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internet breast health information use and coping among women with breast cancer.
    Fogel J
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Feb; 7(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 15006170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Getting a second opinion: health information and the Internet.
    Underhill C; Mckeown L
    Health Rep; 2008 Mar; 19(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 18457212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.