These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3097333)

  • 1. Cost effectiveness of the antibiotic removal device for processing blood cultures.
    de Silva MI; Qadri SM; Hood E
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1986 Sep; 78(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 3097333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.
    Appleman MD; Swinney RS; Heseltine PN
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Feb; 15(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 7068823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the antimicrobial removal device a cost-effective addition to conventional blood cultures?
    Munro R; Collignon PJ; Sorrell TC; Tomlinson P
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Mar; 37(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 6421896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An evaluation of antimicrobial removal device to isolate bacteria from bacteremic patients with hematological disorders].
    Nakazawa H; Okamoto S; Murase T; Yoshii Y; Aoki I; Toyama K; Ando Y; Uchida H
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1984 Jul; 37(7):1272-8. PubMed ID: 6436553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems.
    Moody JA; Fasching CE; Shanholtzer CJ; Gerding DN; Peterson LR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 6386854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.
    Wright AJ; Thompson RL; McLimans CA; Wilson WR; Washington JA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Aug; 78(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 7048940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system.
    Strand CL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Dec; 78(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6756125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved recovery of microorganisms from patients receiving antibiotics with the antimicrobial removal device.
    Peterson LR; Shanholtzer CJ; Mohn ML; Gerding DN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Nov; 80(5):692-6. PubMed ID: 6356871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of an antimicrobial removal device in endophthalmitis cultures.
    Penland RL; Wilhelmus KR
    Retina; 1998; 18(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 9564700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of blood cultures for adult patients with cellulitis.
    Perl B; Gottehrer NP; Raveh D; Schlesinger Y; Rudensky B; Yinnon AM
    Clin Infect Dis; 1999 Dec; 29(6):1483-8. PubMed ID: 10585800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased detection of staphylococcal bacteremia using an anti-microbial removal device.
    Carlson LG; Tenover FC; Plorde JJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 84(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 3898813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the antimicrobial removal device prior to blood culture in patients on antibiotic therapy.
    Ringertz S; Eriksson B; Malmborg AS; Nyström S; Wretlind B
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 4(6):544-7. PubMed ID: 4092699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium.
    Doern GV; Gantz NM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 6350353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Removal Device (ARD) for detection of septicemia.
    Lundholm M
    Scand J Infect Dis; 1986; 18(5):461-3. PubMed ID: 3535052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controlled clinical comparison of VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT blood culture systems.
    Mirrett S; Hanson KE; Reller LB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 45(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 17122016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of the role of multiple site blood cultures in the evaluation of neonatal sepsis.
    Sarkar S; Bhagat I; DeCristofaro JD; Wiswell TE; Spitzer AR
    J Perinatol; 2006 Jan; 26(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 16292335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC plus anaerobic/F to standard anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to plus aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults.
    Wilson ML; Mirrett S; Meredith FT; Weinstein MP; Scotto V; Reller LB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):983-9. PubMed ID: 11230415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of paired blood culture (aerobic/aerobic) and single blood culture, along with clinical importance in catheter versus peripheral line at a tertiary care hospital.
    Tarai B; Das P; Kumar D; Budhiraja S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2012; 30(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 22664435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory Workflow Analysis of Culture of Periprosthetic Tissues in Blood Culture Bottles.
    Peel TN; Sedarski JA; Dylla BL; Shannon SK; Amirahmadi F; Hughes JG; Cheng AC; Patel R
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 55(9):2817-2826. PubMed ID: 28701418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Sepsis and blood culture management].
    Komatsu M; Fukuda S; Kawa N; Yamamoto Y; Matsuo S
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Apr; 53(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 15915771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.