255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30973510)
1. Short-term Outcomes Following Cervical Laminoplasty and Decompression and Fusion With Instrumentation.
Boniello A; Petrucelli P; Kerbel Y; Horn S; Bortz CA; Brown AE; Pierce KE; Alas H; Khalsa A; Passias P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Sep; 44(17):E1018-E1023. PubMed ID: 30973510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perioperative Outcomes After Cervical Laminoplasty Versus Posterior Decompression and Fusion: Analysis of 779 Patients in the ACS-NSQIP Database.
Varthi AG; Basques BA; Bohl DD; Golinvaux NS; Grauer JN
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Jun; 29(5):E226-32. PubMed ID: 25310393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term outcomes following posterior cervical fusion among octogenarians with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a NSQIP database analysis.
Vonck CE; Tanenbaum JE; Bomberger TT; Benzel EC; Savage JW; Kalfas IH; Mroz TE; Steinmetz MP
Spine J; 2018 Sep; 18(9):1603-1611. PubMed ID: 29454135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Half of Unplanned Readmissions Following One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Are Unrelated to Surgical Site.
Sing DC; Vora M; Yue JK; Silveira L; Tannoury C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):573-579. PubMed ID: 31770318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: influence of cervical alignment on outcomes.
Lau D; Winkler EA; Than KD; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):508-517. PubMed ID: 28862572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis.
Heller JG; Edwards CC; Murakami H; Rodts GE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jun; 26(12):1330-6. PubMed ID: 11426147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anterior and posterior cervical fusion in patients with high body mass index are not associated with greater complications.
Buerba RA; Fu MC; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1643-53. PubMed ID: 24388595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery: an analysis of 5,441 patients from the ACS NSQIP 2005-2012.
Sebastian A; Huddleston P; Kakar S; Habermann E; Wagie A; Nassr A
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 26686605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective blocking laminoplasty in cervical laminectomy and fusion to prevent postoperative C5 palsy.
Kim GU; Lee GW
Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):617-623. PubMed ID: 30414991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an analysis of a national, administrative, longitudinal database.
Veeravagu A; Connolly ID; Lamsam L; Li A; Swinney C; Azad TD; Desai A; Ratliff JK
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jun; 40(6):E11. PubMed ID: 27246481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reoperation Rates After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease According to Different Surgical Procedures: National Population-based Cohort Study.
Park MS; Ju YS; Moon SH; Kim TH; Oh JK; Makhni MC; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct; 41(19):1484-1492. PubMed ID: 27031768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine.
Chen Y; Guo Y; Lu X; Chen D; Song D; Shi J; Yuan W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Feb; 24(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20924295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.
Blizzard DJ; Caputo AM; Sheets CZ; Klement MR; Michael KW; Isaacs RE; Brown CR
Eur Spine J; 2017 Jan; 26(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27554354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thirty-day readmission and reoperation rates after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus those after cervical disc replacement.
Bhashyam N; De la Garza Ramos R; Nakhla J; Nasser R; Jada A; Purvis TE; Sciubba DM; Kinon MD; Yassari R
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Feb; 42(2):E6. PubMed ID: 28142261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Kim B; Yoon DH; Shin HC; Kim KN; Yi S; Shin DA; Ha Y
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):875-84. PubMed ID: 25637468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Cervical Spine Surgery?
McCarthy MH; Singh P; Maslak J; Nayak R; Jenkins TJ; Hsu WK; Patel AA
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Nov; 32(9):357-362. PubMed ID: 31567532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra- and Post-Complications of Cervical Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy: An Analysis of a Nationwide Database.
Mesregah MK; Buchanan IA; Formanek B; Wang JC; Buser Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(20):E1302-E1311. PubMed ID: 32453241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.
Highsmith JM; Dhall SS; Haid RW; Rodts GE; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 21388285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.
Yoon ST; Hashimoto RE; Raich A; Shaffrey CI; Rhee JM; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S183-94. PubMed ID: 23963000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of cervical spine surgery in teaching and non-teaching hospitals.
Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Patel AA; Pelton MA; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):1089-96. PubMed ID: 23446765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
