351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30973526)
21. Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective.
Bishop L; Stein J
NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23949043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ArmAssist Robotic System versus Matched Conventional Therapy for Poststroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Tomić TJ; Savić AM; Vidaković AS; Rodić SZ; Isaković MS; Rodríguez-de-Pablo C; Keller T; Konstantinović LM
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():7659893. PubMed ID: 28251157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of Increased Intensity of Physiotherapy on Patient Outcomes After Stroke: An Economic Literature Review and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Chan B
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(7):1-43. PubMed ID: 26366241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Bertani R; Melegari C; De Cola MC; Bramanti A; Bramanti P; Calabrò RS
Neurol Sci; 2017 Sep; 38(9):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 28540536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke.
Wagner TH; Lo AC; Peduzzi P; Bravata DM; Huang GD; Krebs HI; Ringer RJ; Federman DG; Richards LG; Haselkorn JK; Wittenberg GF; Volpe BT; Bever CT; Duncan PW; Siroka A; Guarino PD
Stroke; 2011 Sep; 42(9):2630-2. PubMed ID: 21757677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injuries: a systematic scoping review.
Singh H; Unger J; Zariffa J; Pakosh M; Jaglal S; Craven BC; Musselman KE
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Oct; 13(7):704-715. PubMed ID: 29334467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exoskeleton
Moggio L; de Sire A; Marotta N; Demeco A; Ammendolia A
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 29(8):539-550. PubMed ID: 34420498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of upper-limb robotic-assisted therapy in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke: A single-blind, randomised, controlled trial.
Dehem S; Gilliaux M; Stoquart G; Detrembleur C; Jacquemin G; Palumbo S; Frederick A; Lejeune T
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Sep; 62(5):313-320. PubMed ID: 31028900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study.
Taveggia G; Borboni A; Salvi L; Mulé C; Fogliaresi S; Villafañe JH; Casale R
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Dec; 52(6):767-773. PubMed ID: 27406879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients.
Macclellan LR; Bradham DD; Whitall J; Volpe B; Wilson PD; Ohlhoff J; Meister C; Hogan N; Krebs HI; Bever CT
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 16680609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic approaches for the rehabilitation of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang C; Li-Tsang CW; Au RK
Int J Rehabil Res; 2017 Mar; 40(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 27926617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interventions to promote upper limb recovery in stroke survivors with severe paresis: a systematic review.
Hayward K; Barker R; Brauer S
Disabil Rehabil; 2010; 32(24):1973-86. PubMed ID: 20964563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: a pilot randomized-controlled trial.
Susanto EA; Tong RK; Ockenfeld C; Ho NS
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25906983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Status Scale, and the Action Research Arm Test in chronic stroke with upper-extremity rehabilitation robotic training.
Wei XJ; Tong KY; Hu XL
Int J Rehabil Res; 2011 Dec; 34(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 22044987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Time course of the upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients undergoing conventional or robotic rehabilitation. A preliminary report.
Germanotta M; Cruciani A; Galli C; Cattaneo D; Spedicato A; Aprile I
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2020; 34(5 Suppl. 3):201-208. Technology in Medicine. PubMed ID: 33386050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of proximal versus distal upper-limb robotic rehabilitation on motor performance after stroke: a cluster controlled trial.
Hsieh YW; Lin KC; Wu CY; Shih TY; Li MW; Chen CL
Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2091. PubMed ID: 29391492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy.
Brokaw EB; Nichols D; Holley RJ; Lum PS
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 24297763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy of Upper Extremity Robotic Therapy in Subacute Poststroke Hemiplegia: An Exploratory Randomized Trial.
Takahashi K; Domen K; Sakamoto T; Toshima M; Otaka Y; Seto M; Irie K; Haga B; Takebayashi T; Hachisuka K
Stroke; 2016 May; 47(5):1385-8. PubMed ID: 27006452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
