These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30973526)

  • 41. Robot-assisted therapy for balance function rehabilitation after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zheng QX; Ge L; Wang CC; Ma QS; Liao YT; Huang PP; Wang GD; Xie QL; Rask M
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Jul; 95():7-18. PubMed ID: 31002951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Kinematic measures for upper limb motor assessment during robot-mediated training in patients with severe sub-acute stroke.
    Duret C; Courtial O; Grosmaire AG
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016; 34(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 26890098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An exploration of physiotherapists' experiences of robotic therapy in upper limb rehabilitation within a stroke rehabilitation centre.
    Stephenson A; Stephens J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Apr; 13(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 28366037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Robotic upper limb rehabilitation after acute stroke by NeReBot: evaluation of treatment costs.
    Stefano M; Patrizia P; Mario A; Ferlini G; Rizzello R; Rosati G
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():265634. PubMed ID: 24967345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The sustainability of upper limb robotic therapy for stroke survivors in an inpatient rehabilitation setting.
    Flynn N; Froude E; Cooke D; Dennis J; Kuys S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(24):7522-7527. PubMed ID: 34904486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. What is current practice for upper limb rehabilitation in the acute hospital setting following stroke? A systematic review.
    Serrada I; McDonnell MN; Hillier SL
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2016 Jul; 39(3):431-8. PubMed ID: 27589513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy is a feasible and potentially useful addition to the Community Rehabilitation tool kit after stroke: A pilot randomised control trial.
    Baldwin CR; Harry AJ; Power LJ; Pope KL; Harding KE
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2018 Dec; 65(6):503-511. PubMed ID: 29920688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise on serum BDNF and motor learning in the upper-limb in patients after chronic-stroke: A randomized, controlled feasibility study with embedded health economic evaluation.
    Maguire C; Betschart M; Pohl J; Primani F; Taeymans J; Hund-Georgiadis M
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2023; 52(3):485-506. PubMed ID: 36806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Robotic and Sensor Technology for Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
    Jakob I; Kollreider A; Germanotta M; Benetti F; Cruciani A; Padua L; Aprile I
    PM R; 2018 Sep; 10(9 Suppl 2):S189-S197. PubMed ID: 30269805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Systematic review of mirror therapy compared with conventional rehabilitation in upper extremity function in stroke survivors.
    Pérez-Cruzado D; Merchán-Baeza JA; González-Sánchez M; Cuesta-Vargas AI
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2017 Apr; 64(2):91-112. PubMed ID: 28032336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device: a randomized clinical trial.
    Barker RN; Brauer SG; Carson RG
    Stroke; 2008 Jun; 39(6):1800-7. PubMed ID: 18403742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: results of a feasibility study in home setting.
    Sivan M; Gallagher J; Makower S; Keeling D; Bhakta B; O'Connor RJ; Levesley M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 11():163. PubMed ID: 25495889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Robotic treatment of the upper limb in chronic stroke and cerebral neuroplasticity: a systematic review.
    Bressi F; Bravi M; Campagnola B; Bruno D; Marzolla A; Santacaterina F; Miccinilli S; Sterzi S
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2020; 34(5 Suppl. 3):11-44. Technology in Medicine. PubMed ID: 33386032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Robot-assisted therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chien WT; Chong YY; Tse MK; Chien CW; Cheng HY
    Brain Behav; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e01742. PubMed ID: 32592282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial.
    Saposnik G; Cohen LG; Mamdani M; Pooyania S; Ploughman M; Cheung D; Shaw J; Hall J; Nord P; Dukelow S; Nilanont Y; De Los Rios F; Olmos L; Levin M; Teasell R; Cohen A; Thorpe K; Laupacis A; Bayley M;
    Lancet Neurol; 2016 Sep; 15(10):1019-27. PubMed ID: 27365261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Can robot-based measurements improve prediction of motor performance after robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe sub-acute stroke?
    Duret C; Pila O; Grosmaire AG; Koeppel T
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2019; 37(2):119-129. PubMed ID: 30909254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Facilitating effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery brain-computer interface with robotic feedback for stroke rehabilitation.
    Ang KK; Guan C; Phua KS; Wang C; Zhao L; Teo WP; Chen C; Ng YS; Chew E
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 96(3 Suppl):S79-87. PubMed ID: 25721551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients.
    Daly JJ; Ruff RL
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2007 Dec; 7():2031-45. PubMed ID: 18167618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.
    Forbes C; Shirran L; Bagnall AM; Duffy S; ter Riet G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(28):1-110. PubMed ID: 11701100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.