437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30973834)
1. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty.
O'Reilly EB; Barnett S; Madden C; Welch B; Mickey B; Rozen S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Mar; 68(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25541423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review.
Abu-Ghname A; Banuelos J; Oliver JD; Vyas K; Daniels D; Sharaf B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):433e-443e. PubMed ID: 31461029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
Asaad M; Taslakian EN; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Bite U; Mardini S; Van Gompel JJ; Sharaf B
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):193-197. PubMed ID: 33074970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Cranioplasty Strategies for High-Risk Complex Cranial Defects: A 10-Year Experience.
Soto E; Restrepo RD; Grant JH; Myers RP
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 88(5 Suppl 5):S449-S454. PubMed ID: 34670972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Punchak M; Chung LK; Lagman C; Bui TT; Lazareff J; Rezzadeh K; Jarrahy R; Yang I
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Utility of Polyether-Ether-Ketone Implants Adjacent to Sinus Cavities After Craniofacial Trauma.
Suresh V; Anolik R; Powers D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 76(11):2361-2369. PubMed ID: 29852139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of titanium mesh cranioplasty and polyetheretherketone cranioplasty: protocol for a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial.
Yang J; Sun T; Yuan Y; Li X; Yu H; Guan J
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033997. PubMed ID: 31796495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
Ng ZY; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model.
Lethaus B; Safi Y; ter Laak-Poort M; Kloss-Brandstätter A; Banki F; Robbenmenke C; Steinseifer U; Kessler P
J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
Jaberi J; Gambrell K; Tiwana P; Madden C; Finn R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Large Multicenter Retrospective Research on Embedded Cranioplasty and Covered Cranioplasty.
Zhang Q; Yuan Y; Li X; Sun T; Zhou Y; Yu H; Guan J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():e645-e651. PubMed ID: 29374612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for repair of craniofacial defects.
Rammos CK; Cayci C; Castro-Garcia JA; Feiz-Erfan I; Lettieri SC
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):631-3. PubMed ID: 25901667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cranial reconstruction with prefabricated 3D implant after a gunshot injury: A case report.
Malivuković A; Novaković N; Lepić M; Minić L; Stepić N; Đorđević B; Rasulić L
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug; 73(8):783-7. PubMed ID: 29328616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.
Pfnür A; Tosin D; Petkov M; Sharon O; Mayer B; Wirtz CR; Knoll A; Pala A
Neurosurg Rev; 2024 Jan; 47(1):72. PubMed ID: 38285230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants polyether ether ketone with computer-assisted planning.
Manrique OJ; Lalezarzadeh F; Dayan E; Shin J; Buchbinder D; Smith M
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):663-6. PubMed ID: 25974770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants.
Jonkergouw J; van de Vijfeijken SE; Nout E; Theys T; Van de Casteele E; Folkersma H; Depauw PR; Becking AG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 27524384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
