These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30973834)

  • 21. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants.
    Jonkergouw J; van de Vijfeijken SE; Nout E; Theys T; Van de Casteele E; Folkersma H; Depauw PR; Becking AG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 27524384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modelling and structural analysis of skull/cranial implant: beyond mid-line deformities.
    Bogu VP; Kumar YR; Kumar Khanara A
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 28552926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The therapeutic cranioplasty still needs an ideal material and surgical timing.
    Servadei F; Iaccarino C
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 25153284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Complex skull defects reconstruction with САD/САМ titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants.
    Eolchiyan SA
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2014; 78(4):3-13. PubMed ID: 25406805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analyzing the Cost of Autogenous Cranioplasty Versus Custom-Made Patient-Specific Alloplastic Cranioplasty.
    Mrad MA; Murrad K; Antonyshyn O
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):1260-1263. PubMed ID: 28582300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-Term Complications of Cranioplasty Using Stored Autologous Bone Graft, Three-Dimensional Polymethyl Methacrylate, or Titanium Mesh After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Single-Center Experience After 596 Procedures.
    Yeap MC; Tu PH; Liu ZH; Hsieh PC; Liu YT; Lee CY; Lai HY; Chen CT; Huang YC; Wei KC; Wu CT; Chen CC
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e841-e850. PubMed ID: 31082551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The therapeutic effect of patient-specific implants in cranioplasty.
    Zegers T; Ter Laak-Poort M; Koper D; Lethaus B; Kessler P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 45(1):82-86. PubMed ID: 27916400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical preference regarding different materials for custom-made allograft cranioplasty in patients with calvarial defects: Results from an internal audit covering the last 20 years.
    Ganau M; Cebula H; Fricia M; Zaed I; Todeschi J; Scibilia A; Gallinaro P; Coca A; Chaussemy D; Ollivier I; Ligarotti GKI; des Neiges Santin M; Proust F; Chibbaro S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 74():98-103. PubMed ID: 32033859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating compared with polyether ether ketone: evaluation of the periphery and inner surfaces of an implant.
    Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Christou C; He J; Vizesi F; Boden SD
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 29496625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Polyether Ether Ketone Cranioplasties Are Permeable to Diagnostic Ultrasound.
    Mursch K; Behnke-Mursch J
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():142-143. PubMed ID: 29920388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Polyetheretherketone implants for the repair of large cranial defects: a 3-center experience.
    Rosenthal G; Ng I; Moscovici S; Lee KK; Lay T; Martin C; Manley GT
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Nov; 75(5):523-9; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 24979096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts--success and cost analysis.
    Lethaus B; Bloebaum M; Koper D; Poort-Ter Laak M; Kessler P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1948-51. PubMed ID: 25443869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Titanium Mesh and Custom Implants for Cranioplasty.
    Rosinski CL; Patel S; Geever B; Chiu RG; Chaker AN; Zakrzewski J; Rosenberg DM; Parola R; Shah K; Behbahani M; Mehta AI
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Jan; 86(1):E15-E22. PubMed ID: 31529096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between the different types of heterologous materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
    Morselli C; Zaed I; Tropeano MP; Cataletti G; Iaccarino C; Rossini Z; Servadei F
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2019 Dec; 63(6):723-736. PubMed ID: 31599560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Considerations in computer-aided design for inlay cranioplasty: technical note.
    Nout E; Mommaerts MY
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 29313149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
    Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
    Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The application of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in cranioplasty.
    Zhang J; Tian W; Chen J; Yu J; Zhang J; Chen J
    Brain Res Bull; 2019 Nov; 153():143-149. PubMed ID: 31425730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contemporary Review on Craniectomy and Cranioplasty; Part 2: Material Selection and Plate Manufacture.
    Hatamleh MM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 May; 33(3):842-845. PubMed ID: 34334754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Discussion of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
    Mitchell KA; Gordon C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):198-200. PubMed ID: 33235163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reconstruction of frontal bone using specific implant polyether-ether-ketone.
    Camarini ET; Tomeh JK; Dias RR; da Silva EJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2205-7. PubMed ID: 22075823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.