215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30974941)
1. Can One Trust Kinetic and Thermodynamic Observables from Biased Metadynamics Simulations?: Detailed Quantitative Benchmarks on Millimolar Drug Fragment Dissociation.
Pramanik D; Smith Z; Kells A; Tiwary P
J Phys Chem B; 2019 May; 123(17):3672-3678. PubMed ID: 30974941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of water and steric constraints in the kinetics of cavity-ligand unbinding.
Tiwary P; Mondal J; Morrone JA; Berne BJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(39):12015-9. PubMed ID: 26371312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transient States and Barriers from Molecular Simulations and the Milestoning Theory: Kinetics in Ligand-Protein Recognition and Compound Design.
Tang Z; Chen SH; Chang CA
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1882-1895. PubMed ID: 32031801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative Characterization of the Binding and Unbinding of Millimolar Drug Fragments with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Pan AC; Xu H; Palpant T; Shaw DE
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jul; 13(7):3372-3377. PubMed ID: 28582625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A combination of machine learning and infrequent metadynamics to efficiently predict kinetic rates, transition states, and molecular determinants of drug dissociation from G protein-coupled receptors.
Lamim Ribeiro JM; Provasi D; Filizola M
J Chem Phys; 2020 Sep; 153(12):124105. PubMed ID: 33003748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attempting Well-Tempered Funnel Metadynamics Simulations for the Evaluation of the Binding Kinetics of Methionine Aminopeptidase-II Inhibitors.
Rubina ; Moin ST
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(24):7729-7743. PubMed ID: 38059911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding the impact of binding free energy and kinetics calculations in modern drug discovery.
Adediwura VA; Koirala K; Do HN; Wang J; Miao Y
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2024 Jun; 19(6):671-682. PubMed ID: 38722032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ligand-Binding Calculations with Metadynamics.
Provasi D
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():233-253. PubMed ID: 31396906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transition-Tempered Metadynamics Is a Promising Tool for Studying the Permeation of Drug-like Molecules through Membranes.
Sun R; Dama JF; Tan JS; Rose JP; Voth GA
J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Oct; 12(10):5157-5169. PubMed ID: 27598403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Ligand Dissociation Rates and Mechanisms from τRAMD Simulations.
Kokh DB; Wade RC
J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6610-6623. PubMed ID: 34495672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metadynamics to Enhance Sampling in Biomolecular Simulations.
Pfaendtner J
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():179-200. PubMed ID: 31396904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinetics of Ligand-Protein Dissociation from All-Atom Simulations: Are We There Yet?
Ribeiro JML; Tsai ST; Pramanik D; Wang Y; Tiwary P
Biochemistry; 2019 Jan; 58(3):156-165. PubMed ID: 30547565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinetics of Ligand Binding Through Advanced Computational Approaches: A Review.
Dickson A; Tiwary P; Vashisth H
Curr Top Med Chem; 2017; 17(23):2626-2641. PubMed ID: 28413946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating Small-Molecule Ligand Binding to G Protein-Coupled Receptors with Biased or Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Marino KA; Filizola M
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():351-364. PubMed ID: 29188572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of Molecular Dynamics and Related Methods in Drug Discovery.
De Vivo M; Masetti M; Bottegoni G; Cavalli A
J Med Chem; 2016 May; 59(9):4035-61. PubMed ID: 26807648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conformational free energy modeling of druglike molecules by metadynamics in the WHIM space.
Spiwok V; Hlat-Glembová K; Tvaroška I; Králová B
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):804-13. PubMed ID: 22360151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinetics of Huperzine A Dissociation from Acetylcholinesterase via Multiple Unbinding Pathways.
Rydzewski J; Jakubowski R; Nowak W; Grubmüller H
J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):2843-2851. PubMed ID: 29715428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating drug-target association and dissociation mechanisms using metadynamics-based algorithms.
Cavalli A; Spitaleri A; Saladino G; Gervasio FL
Acc Chem Res; 2015 Feb; 48(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 25496113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Are Redefining Our View of Peptides Interacting with Biological Membranes.
Ulmschneider JP; Ulmschneider MB
Acc Chem Res; 2018 May; 51(5):1106-1116. PubMed ID: 29667836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying Unbiased Conformational Ensembles from Biased Simulations Using ShapeGMM.
Sasmal S; Pal T; Hocky GM; McCullagh M
J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 May; 20(9):3492-3502. PubMed ID: 38662196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
