BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30974955)

  • 1. The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in Multiple Sclerosis: a multicentre randomized trial.
    Renfrew LM; Paul L; McFadyen A; Rafferty D; Moseley O; Lord AC; Bowers R; Mattison P
    Clin Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1150-1162. PubMed ID: 30974955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surplus value of implanted peroneal functional electrical stimulation over ankle-foot orthosis for gait adaptability in people with foot drop after stroke.
    Berenpas F; Geurts AC; den Boer J; van Swigchem R; Nollet F; Weerdesteyn V
    Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():157-162. PubMed ID: 31071538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived Exertion Is Lower When Using a Functional Electrical Stimulation Neuroprosthesis Compared With an Ankle-Foot Orthosis in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Preliminary Study.
    Khurana SR; Beranger AG; Felix ER
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 96(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 27680426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experiences of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) for foot-drop in people with multiple sclerosis.
    Bulley C; Mercer TH; Hooper JE; Cowan P; Scott S; van der Linden ML
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 Nov; 10(6):458-467. PubMed ID: 24796365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bethoux F; Rogers HL; Nolan KJ; Abrams GM; Annaswamy TM; Brandstater M; Browne B; Burnfield JM; Feng W; Freed MJ; Geis C; Greenberg J; Gudesblatt M; Ikramuddin F; Jayaraman A; Kautz SA; Lutsep HL; Madhavan S; Meilahn J; Pease WS; Rao N; Seetharama S; Sethi P; Turk MA; Wallis RA; Kufta C
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Sep; 28(7):688-97. PubMed ID: 24526708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke.
    Bethoux F; Rogers HL; Nolan KJ; Abrams GM; Annaswamy T; Brandstater M; Browne B; Burnfield JM; Feng W; Freed MJ; Geis C; Greenberg J; Gudesblatt M; Ikramuddin F; Jayaraman A; Kautz SA; Lutsep HL; Madhavan S; Meilahn J; Pease WS; Rao N; Seetharama S; Sethi P; Turk MA; Wallis RA; Kufta C
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2015; 29(10):911-22. PubMed ID: 25653225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in multiple sclerosis.
    Miller Renfrew L; Lord AC; McFadyen AK; Rafferty D; Hunter R; Bowers R; Mattison P; Moseley O; Paul L
    J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng; 2018; 5():2055668318755071. PubMed ID: 31191925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The long-term cost-effectiveness of the use of Functional Electrical Stimulation for the correction of dropped foot due to upper motor neuron lesion.
    Taylor P; Humphreys L; Swain I
    J Rehabil Med; 2013 Feb; 45(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23303521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematic and kinetic benefits of implantable peroneal nerve stimulation in people with post-stroke drop foot using an ankle-foot orthosis.
    Berenpas F; Schiemanck S; Beelen A; Nollet F; Weerdesteyn V; Geurts A
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(4):547-558. PubMed ID: 29889089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gait Characteristics Following Stroke: A Prospective Crossover Study to Compare Ankle-Foot Orthosis with Functional Electrical Stimulation.
    Sannyasi G; Ojha R; Prakash NB; Isaac J; Maheswari V; Mahasampath GS; Tharion G
    Neurol India; 2022; 70(5):1830-1835. PubMed ID: 36352574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of walking speed on the effects of functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis.
    Miller L; Rafferty D; Paul L; Mattison P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Aug; 11(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 25826047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional electrical stimulation compared with ankle-foot orthosis in subacute post stroke patients with foot drop: A pilot study.
    Karniel N; Raveh E; Schwartz I; Portnoy S
    Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 33(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 30945999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of implantable peroneal nerve stimulation on gait quality, energy expenditure, participation and user satisfaction in patients with post-stroke drop foot using an ankle-foot orthosis.
    Schiemanck S; Berenpas F; van Swigchem R; van den Munckhof P; de Vries J; Beelen A; Nollet F; Geurts AC
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2015; 33(6):795-807. PubMed ID: 26484694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 6-Month Home-Based Functional Electrical Stimulation Program for Foot Drop in a Post-Stroke Patient: Considerations on a Time Course Analysis of Walking Performance.
    David R; Billot M; Ojardias E; Parratte B; Roulaud M; Ounajim A; Louis F; Meklat H; Foucault P; Lombard C; Jossart A; Mainini L; Lavallière M; Goudman L; Moens M; Laroche D; Salga M; Genêt F; Daviet JC; Perrochon A; Compagnat M; Rigoard P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35954558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized crossover study of functional electrical stimulation during walking in spastic cerebral palsy: the FES on participation (FESPa) trial.
    Moll I; Marcellis RGJ; Coenen MLP; Fleuren SM; Willems PJB; Speth LAWM; Witlox MA; Meijer K; Vermeulen RJ
    BMC Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 22(1):37. PubMed ID: 35027013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Everaert DG; Stein RB; Abrams GM; Dromerick AW; Francisco GE; Hafner BJ; Huskey TN; Munin MC; Nolan KJ; Kufta CV
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2013 Sep; 27(7):579-91. PubMed ID: 23558080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of a simple functional electric system and/or a hinged ankle-foot orthosis on walking in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury.
    Kim CM; Eng JJ; Whittaker MW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 85(10):1718-23. PubMed ID: 15468037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized comparison of functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position and motor program activating therapy: treating foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis.
    Prokopiusova T; Pavlikova M; Markova M; Rasova K
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Aug; 56(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 32383574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of peroneal electrical stimulation versus an ankle-foot orthosis on obstacle avoidance ability in people with stroke-related foot drop.
    van Swigchem R; van Duijnhoven HJ; den Boer J; Geurts AC; Weerdesteyn V
    Phys Ther; 2012 Mar; 92(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 22135711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Ankle-Foot Orthoses and Functional Electrical Stimulation Post-Stroke.
    Johnston TE; Keller S; Denzer-Weiler C; Brown L
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2021 Apr; 45(2):112-196. PubMed ID: 33675603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.