264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30975038)
1. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2474-2494. PubMed ID: 30975038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The testing effect under divided attention: Educational application.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):558-575. PubMed ID: 31070392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention and the testing effect.
Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attention, the testing effect, and retrieval-induced forgetting: Distraction dissociates the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory.
Mulligan NW; Buchin ZL; West JT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1905-1922. PubMed ID: 34726435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.
Guez J; Naveh-Benjamin M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74447. PubMed ID: 24040249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing enhances subsequent learning in older adults.
Pastötter B; Bäuml KT
Psychol Aging; 2019 Mar; 34(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 30335442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of divided attention at encoding and at retrieval on multidimensional source memory.
Greene NR; Martin BA; Naveh-Benjamin M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1870-1887. PubMed ID: 34398626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
Weeks JC; Hasher L
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confabulation in healthy aging is related to poor encoding and retrieval of over-learned information.
Attali E; Dalla Barba G
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2013; 20(3):339-55. PubMed ID: 22934610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are attentional resources a mediator for sex differences in memory?
Seçer I; Yılmazoğulları Y
Int J Psychol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 25451245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of age and a divided attention task presented during encoding and retrieval on memory.
Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN; Lafronza VN
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1185-91. PubMed ID: 2530311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Divided attention at encoding or retrieval interferes with emotionally enhanced memory for words.
Yeung RC; Fernandes MA
Memory; 2021 Mar; 29(3):284-297. PubMed ID: 33619990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value-directed retrieval: The effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval on memory selectivity and retrieval dynamics.
Murphy DH; Schwartz ST; Castel AD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 37326541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information.
Finn B; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1665-81. PubMed ID: 23565780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Divided attention improves delayed, but not immediate retrieval of a consolidated memory.
Kessler Y; Vandermorris S; Gopie N; Daros A; Winocur G; Moscovitch M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91309. PubMed ID: 24608365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why does saccade execution increase episodic memory retrieval? A test of the top-down attentional control hypothesis.
Lyle KB; Edlin JM
Memory; 2015; 23(2):187-202. PubMed ID: 24499320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
