158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30975576)
21. Structural habitat predicts functional dispersal habitat of a large carnivore: how leopards change spots.
Fattebert J; Robinson HS; Balme G; Slotow R; Hunter L
Ecol Appl; 2015 Oct; 25(7):1911-21. PubMed ID: 26591456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A spatially explicit model of functional connectivity for the endangered Przewalski's gazelle (Procapra przewalskii) in a patchy landscape.
Li C; Jiang Z; Fang H; Li C
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80065. PubMed ID: 24250829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Evaluation of landscape connectivity based on least-cost model].
Wu CG; Zhou ZX; Wang PC; Xiao WF; Teng MJ; Peng L
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Aug; 20(8):2042-8. PubMed ID: 19947231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the multi-scale predictive ability of ecosystem functional attributes for species distribution modelling.
Arenas-Castro S; Gonçalves J; Alves P; Alcaraz-Segura D; Honrado JP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199292. PubMed ID: 29912933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity.
Lookingbill TR; Gardner RH; Ferrari JR; Keller CE
Ecol Appl; 2010 Mar; 20(2):427-41. PubMed ID: 20405797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combining direct and indirect impacts to assess ecosystem service loss due to infrastructure construction.
Tardieu L; Roussel S; Thompson JD; Labarraque D; Salles JM
J Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 152():145-57. PubMed ID: 25621389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Why is a landscape perspective important in studies of primates?
Arroyo-Rodríguez V; Fahrig L
Am J Primatol; 2014 Oct; 76(10):901-9. PubMed ID: 24715680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Replicated landscape genetic and network analyses reveal wide variation in functional connectivity for American pikas.
Castillo JA; Epps CW; Jeffress MR; Ray C; Rodhouse TJ; Schwalm D
Ecol Appl; 2016 Sep; 26(6):1660-1676. PubMed ID: 27755691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction.
Thomson JR; Moilanen AJ; Vesk PA; Bennett AF; Nally RM
Ecol Appl; 2009 Jun; 19(4):817-28. PubMed ID: 19544726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surface-water dynamics and land use influence landscape connectivity across a major dryland region.
Bishop-Taylor R; Tulbure MG; Broich M
Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1124-1137. PubMed ID: 28117907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity.
Estrada E; Bodin O
Ecol Appl; 2008 Oct; 18(7):1810-25. PubMed ID: 18839774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantifying the impact of vegetation-based metrics on species persistence when choosing offsets for habitat destruction.
Marshall E; Valavi R; Connor LO; Cadenhead N; Southwell D; Wintle BA; Kujala H
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):567-577. PubMed ID: 32720732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Graph models of habitat mosaics.
Urban DL; Minor ES; Treml EA; Schick RS
Ecol Lett; 2009 Mar; 12(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 19161432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Scale-dependent influence of the sagebrush community on genetic connectivity of the sagebrush obligate Gunnison sage-grouse.
Zimmerman SJ; Aldridge CL; Hooten MB; Oyler-McCance SJ
Mol Ecol; 2022 Jun; 31(12):3267-3285. PubMed ID: 35501946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Alpine glacial relict species losing out to climate change: The case of the fragmented mountain hare population (Lepus timidus) in the Alps.
Rehnus M; Bollmann K; Schmatz DR; Hackländer K; Braunisch V
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Jul; 24(7):3236-3253. PubMed ID: 29532601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Two-dimensional gap analysis: a tool for efficient conservation planning and biodiversity policy implementation.
Angelstam P; Mikusiński G; Rönnbäck BI; Ostman A; Lazdinis M; Roberge JM; Arnberg W; Olsson J
Ambio; 2003 Dec; 32(8):527-34. PubMed ID: 15049349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consequences of ignoring dispersal variation in network models for landscape connectivity.
Sullivan LL; Michalska-Smith MJ; Sperry KP; Moeller DA; Shaw AK
Conserv Biol; 2021 Jun; 35(3):944-954. PubMed ID: 32975336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Improvement and application for ecological networks using landscape pattern and connectivity methods.].
Liu JJ; Chen JR; Lai YN; Luo BY; Zhao F; DU Q
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Sep; 30(9):3108-3118. PubMed ID: 31529886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biodiversity impact assessment (BIA+) - methodological framework for screening biodiversity.
Winter L; Pflugmacher S; Berger M; Finkbeiner M
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Mar; 14(2):282-297. PubMed ID: 29125898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses.
Tscharntke T; Tylianakis JM; Rand TA; Didham RK; Fahrig L; Batáry P; Bengtsson J; Clough Y; Crist TO; Dormann CF; Ewers RM; Fründ J; Holt RD; Holzschuh A; Klein AM; Kleijn D; Kremen C; Landis DA; Laurance W; Lindenmayer D; Scherber C; Sodhi N; Steffan-Dewenter I; Thies C; van der Putten WH; Westphal C
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2012 Aug; 87(3):661-85. PubMed ID: 22272640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
