329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30975577)
1. Mandibular canal-related parameters interpreted in panoramic images and CBCT of mandibular third molars as risk factors to predict sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve.
Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Schropp L; Wenzel A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 48(8):1094-1101. PubMed ID: 30975577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance after impacted mandibular third molar evaluation using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
Guerrero ME; Nackaerts O; Beinsberger J; Horner K; Schoenaers J; Jacobs R;
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):2264-70. PubMed ID: 22705219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do anatomical variations of the mandibular canal pose an increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar removal?
Vranckx M; Geerinckx H; Gaêta-Araujo H; Leite AF; Politis C; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):931-937. PubMed ID: 34279700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in predicting mandibular nerve exposure during third molar surgery.
Hasani A; Ahmadi Moshtaghin F; Roohi P; Rakhshan V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 46(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27810140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does additional cone beam computed tomography decrease the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury in high-risk cases undergoing third molar surgery?Does CBCT decrease the risk of IAN injury?
Korkmaz YT; Kayıpmaz S; Senel FC; Atasoy KT; Gumrukcu Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 46(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 28174060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is MRI a viable alternative to CT/CBCT to identify the course of the inferior alveolar nerve in relation to the roots of the third molars?
Beck F; Austermann S; Bertl K; Ulm C; Lettner S; Toelly A; Gahleitner A
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jun; 25(6):3861-3871. PubMed ID: 33289048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation.
Patel PS; Shah JS; Dudhia BB; Butala PB; Jani YV; Macwan RS
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 32246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Reia VCB; de Toledo Telles-Araujo G; Peralta-Mamani M; Biancardi MR; Rubira CMF; Rubira-Bullen IRF
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4721-4733. PubMed ID: 34275000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT.
Matzen LH; Schropp L; Spin-Neto R; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Jan; 46(1):20160330. PubMed ID: 27681861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of radiographic findings in large FOV CBCTs of mandibular third molars as basis for pre-operative patient information.
Matzen LH; Schropp L; Hermann L; Ingerslev J; Wenzel A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2022 Apr; 80(3):210-217. PubMed ID: 34649477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of panoramic radiography to predict postsurgical sensory impairment following extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Huang CK; Lui MT; Cheng DH
J Chin Med Assoc; 2015 Oct; 78(10):617-22. PubMed ID: 26041067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography.
Freire BB; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos KF; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 31072782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone beam CT and treatment decision of mandibular third molars: removal
Matzen LH; Villefrance JS; Nørholt SE; Bak J; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Mar; 49(3):20190250. PubMed ID: 31778318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars.
Peker I; Sarikir C; Alkurt MT; Zor ZF
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Jun; 14():71. PubMed ID: 24928108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Ghaeminia H; Gerlach NL; Hoppenreijs TJ; Kicken M; Dings JP; Borstlap WA; de Haan T; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2158-67. PubMed ID: 26596360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone-beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population.
Winstanley KL; Otway LM; Thompson L; Brook ZH; King N; Koong B; O'Halloran M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Aug; 9(3):e12323. PubMed ID: 29399983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal bone loss and resorption of second molars related to maxillary third molars in panoramic images compared with CBCT.
Hermann L; Wenzel A; Schropp L; Matzen LH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 May; 48(4):20180313. PubMed ID: 30652501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis.
Deppe H; Ritschl LM; Kleinschmidt J; Wagenpfeil S; Sculean A
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(6):470-477. PubMed ID: 31086860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
