These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30977212)

  • 1. Trueness of cone beam computed tomography versus intra-oral scanner derived three-dimensional digital models: An ex vivo study.
    Al-Rimawi A; Shaheen E; Albdour EA; Shujaat S; Politis C; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 30977212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
    de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of IOS in Full-Arch Dentate Patients Compared to CBCT Cast-Scanning. An In-Vivo Study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Pavlakis E; Kourakis G; Papavasiliou G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Aug; 27(3):122-130. PubMed ID: 31433136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of three-dimensional printed models derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ferraro JM; Falter J; Lee S; Watanabe K; Wu TH; Kim DG; Ko CC; Tanaka E; Deguchi T
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):722-727. PubMed ID: 35852459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method.
    Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy.
    Liang X; Lambrichts I; Sun Y; Denis K; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 19423257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of miniscrews as references in cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner digital models: study on goat heads.
    Jiang Y; Chen G
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):259. PubMed ID: 31771579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of preemptively constructed, cone beam CT-, and CAD/CAM technology-based, individual Root Analogue Implant technique: an in vitro pilot investigation.
    Moin DA; Hassan B; Parsa A; Mercelis P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):598-602. PubMed ID: 23278702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices.
    Celikten B; Jacobs R; deFaria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Nicolielo LFP; Orhan K
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1517-1521. PubMed ID: 28673491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Replacement of the Distorted Dentition of the Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans for Orthognathic Surgery Planning.
    Almutairi T; Naudi K; Nairn N; Ju X; Whitters J; Ayoub A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1561.e1-1561.e8. PubMed ID: 29572134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. As Low Dose as Sufficient Quality: Optimization of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scanning Protocol for Tooth Autotransplantation Planning and Follow-up in Children.
    EzEldeen M; Stratis A; Coucke W; Codari M; Politis C; Jacobs R
    J Endod; 2017 Feb; 43(2):210-217. PubMed ID: 28027823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
    Elsaltani MH; Farid MM; Eldin Ashmawy MS
    J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):972-7. PubMed ID: 27130336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital registration versus cone-beam computed tomography for evaluating implant position: a prospective cohort study.
    Han X; Wei D; Jiang X; Di P; Yi C; Lin Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):304. PubMed ID: 38438985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-Modal Digital Impressions For Palatal Defects.
    Abu Baker D; Patel S; Charalambous P; Albuloushi N; Rodriguez J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 32(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 37721541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.
    Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and dimensional reproducibility by model scanning, intraoral scanning, and CBCT imaging for digital implant dentistry.
    Komuro A; Yamada Y; Uesugi S; Terashima H; Kimura M; Kishimoto H; Iida T; Sakamoto K; Okuda K; Kusano K; Baba S; Sakamoto T
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jun; 7(1):63. PubMed ID: 34189641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of exposure protocol, voxel size, and artifact removal algorithm on the trueness of segmentation utilizing an artificial-intelligence-based system.
    Alrashed S; Dutra V; Chu TG; Yang CC; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; 33(6):574-583. PubMed ID: 38305665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.