These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30977315)
21. An Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Trauma Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study. Lee S; Kang WS; Kim DW; Seo SH; Kim J; Jeong ST; Yon DK; Lee J J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e49283. PubMed ID: 37642984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Educational Simulation Program Based on Korean Triage and Acuity Scale. Jang JH; Kim SS; Kim S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(23):. PubMed ID: 33287363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of deep-learning-based triage and acuity score using a large national dataset. Kwon JM; Lee Y; Lee Y; Lee S; Park H; Park J PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205836. PubMed ID: 30321231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage. Green NA; Durani Y; Brecher D; DePiero A; Loiselle J; Attia M Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Aug; 28(8):753-7. PubMed ID: 22858740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in elderly patients: A cohort study. Kuriyama A; Kaihara T; Ikegami T Am J Emerg Med; 2019 Dec; 37(12):2159-2164. PubMed ID: 30876775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of the Emergency Severity Index (Version 4) for the Triage of Adult Emergency Department Patients With Active Cancer. Adler D; Abar B; Durham DD; Bastani A; Bernstein SL; Baugh CW; Bischof JJ; Coyne CJ; Grudzen CR; Henning DJ; Hudson MF; Klotz A; Lyman GH; Madsen TE; Pallin DJ; Reyes-Gibby CC; Rico JF; Ryan RJ; Shapiro NI; Swor R; Thomas CR; Venkat A; Wilson J; Yeung SJ; Caterino JM J Emerg Med; 2019 Sep; 57(3):354-361. PubMed ID: 31353265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting admission of patients by their presentation to the emergency department. Kim SW; Li JY; Hakendorf P; Teubner DJ; Ben-Tovim DI; Thompson CH Emerg Med Australas; 2014 Aug; 26(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 24934833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Facilitators and Barriers of the Triage Process based on Emergency Nurses' Experience with the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Moon SH; Jeon MK; Ju D Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2021 Oct; 15(4):255-264. PubMed ID: 34375758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Singapore Paediatric Triage Scale Validation Study. Ganapathy S; Yeo JG; Thia XHM; Hei GMA; Tham LP Singapore Med J; 2018 Apr; 59(4):205-209. PubMed ID: 28983578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive indicators for determining red blood cell transfusion strategies in the emergency department. Song J; Kim S; Chung HS; Park I; Kwon SS; Myung J Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 30(4):260-266. PubMed ID: 37115971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Level in Emergency Department Patients. Choi SW; Ko T; Hong KJ; Kim KH Healthc Inform Res; 2019 Oct; 25(4):305-312. PubMed ID: 31777674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analyzing Factors Affecting Emergency Department Length of Stay-Using a Competing Risk-accelerated Failure Time Model. Chaou CH; Chiu TF; Yen AM; Ng CJ; Chen HH Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Apr; 95(14):e3263. PubMed ID: 27057879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to predict Emergency Department Disposition: A derivation and internal validation study using retrospective state-wide data from New South Wales, Australia. Dinh MM; Russell SB; Bein KJ; Rogers K; Muscatello D; Paoloni R; Hayman J; Chalkley DR; Ivers R BMC Emerg Med; 2016 Dec; 16(1):46. PubMed ID: 27912757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Triage-based resource allocation and clinical treatment protocol on outcome and length of stay in the emergency department. Ro YS; Shin SD; Song KJ; Cha WC; Cho JS Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Aug; 27(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 26075591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in adults: a cohort study. Kuriyama A; Ikegami T; Kaihara T; Fukuoka T; Nakayama T Emerg Med J; 2018 Jun; 35(6):384-388. PubMed ID: 29535086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does rapid blood sampling affect the retention time of patients with low-acuity complaints in the emergency department? Lee JY; Oh SH; Park KN; Lim JY; Lee JM; Park HS; Kim HJ Int Emerg Nurs; 2017 Mar; 31():41-45. PubMed ID: 28277237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Korean Triage and Acuity Scale education using role-playing and its effects on triage competency: A quasi-experimental design. Seo YH; Lim SO PLoS One; 2024; 19(10):e0311892. PubMed ID: 39401207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of physician screening in the emergency department on patient flow. Soremekun OA; Capp R; Biddinger PD; White BA; Chang Y; Carignan SB; Brown DF J Emerg Med; 2012 Sep; 43(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 22445677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of an emergency department dedicated midtrack area on patient flow. Soremekun OA; Shofer FS; Grasso D; Mills AM; Moore J; Datner EM Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Apr; 21(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 24730406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]