166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30978125)
21. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of Activity Trackers in Parkinson Disease: Should We Prescribe Them?
Wendel N; Macpherson CE; Webber K; Hendron K; DeAngelis T; Colon-Semenza C; Ellis T
Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 98(8):705-714. PubMed ID: 29718452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke.
Schaffer SD; Holzapfel SD; Fulk G; Bosch PR
Physiother Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 33(10):788-796. PubMed ID: 28777710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preliminary concurrent validity of the Fitbit-Zip and ActiGraph activity monitors for measuring steps in people with polymyalgia rheumatica.
Chandrasekar A; Hensor EMA; Mackie SL; Backhouse MR; Harris E
Gait Posture; 2018 Mar; 61():339-345. PubMed ID: 29427859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.
Nelson BW; Allen NB
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e10828. PubMed ID: 30855232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validity of activity wristbands for estimating daily physical activity in primary schoolchildren under free-living conditions: School-Fit study.
Mayorga-Vega D; Casado-Robles C; Guijarro-Romero S; Viciana J
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1211237. PubMed ID: 37554735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validity of Garmin Vívofit 1 and Garmin Vívofit 3 for School-Based Physical Activity Monitoring.
Šimůnek A; Dygrýn J; Jakubec L; Neuls F; Frömel K; Welk GJ
Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2019 Feb; 31(1):130-136. PubMed ID: 30304974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validity of the Fitbit Ace and Moki Devices for Assessing Steps During Different Walking Conditions in Young Adolescents.
Sun X; Adams SA; Li C; Booth JN; Robertson J; Fawkner S
Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2022 Feb; 34(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 34784580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study.
Hao Y; Ma XK; Zhu Z; Cao ZB
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e18320. PubMed ID: 33410757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The validity of using activity monitors to detect step count after lumbar fusion surgery.
Gilmore SJ; Davidson M; Hahne AJ; McClelland JA
Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Mar; 42(6):863-868. PubMed ID: 30326754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of consumer-based activity trackers as measuring tool and coaching device in patients with COPD and healthy controls.
Blondeel A; Demeyer H; Janssens W; Troosters T
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236676. PubMed ID: 32750073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Wrist-Worn Wearables for Monitoring Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure While Sitting or Performing Light-to-Vigorous Physical Activity: Validation Study.
Düking P; Giessing L; Frenkel MO; Koehler K; Holmberg HC; Sperlich B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e16716. PubMed ID: 32374274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validity of activity trackers, smartphones, and phone applications to measure steps in various walking conditions.
Höchsmann C; Knaier R; Eymann J; Hintermann J; Infanger D; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Jul; 28(7):1818-1827. PubMed ID: 29460319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantifying Step Count and Oxygen Consumption with Portable Technology during the 2-Min Walk Test in People with Lower Limb Amputation.
Smith JD; Guerra G
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33809581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the Wrist-Worn Fitbit Charge 2 and the Waist-Worn Actigraph GTX3 for Measuring Steps Taken in Occupational Settings.
Garza JL; Wu ZH; Singh M; Cherniack MG
Ann Work Expo Health; 2022 Feb; 66(2):281-284. PubMed ID: 34383020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking.
Takacs J; Pollock CL; Guenther JR; Bahar M; Napier C; Hunt MA
J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 24268570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
