198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30978492)
1. MK-curve - Characterizing the relation between mean kurtosis and alterations in the diffusion MRI signal.
Zhang F; Ning L; O'Donnell LJ; Pasternak O
Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():68-80. PubMed ID: 30978492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MK-Curve improves sensitivity to identify white matter alterations in clinical high risk for psychosis.
Zhang F; Cho KIK; Tang Y; Zhang T; Kelly S; Biase MD; Xu L; Li H; Matcheri K; Whitfield-Gabrieli S; Niznikiewicz M; Stone WS; Wang J; Shenton ME; Pasternak O
Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117564. PubMed ID: 33285331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mean kurtosis-Curve (MK-Curve) correction improves the test-retest reproducibility of diffusion kurtosis imaging at 3 T.
Christiaanse E; Wyss PO; Scheel-Sailer A; Frotzler A; Lehnick D; Verma RK; Berger MF; Leemans A; De Luca A
NMR Biomed; 2023 Mar; 36(3):e4856. PubMed ID: 36285630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain.
Lanzafame S; Giannelli M; Garaci F; Floris R; Duggento A; Guerrisi M; Toschi N
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2464. PubMed ID: 27147357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep learning based segmentation of brain tissue from diffusion MRI.
Zhang F; Breger A; Cho KIK; Ning L; Westin CF; O'Donnell LJ; Pasternak O
Neuroimage; 2021 Jun; 233():117934. PubMed ID: 33737246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating High Spatial Resolution Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging at 3T: Reproducibility and Quality of Fit.
Kasa LW; Haast RAM; Kuehn TK; Mushtaha FN; Baron CA; Peters T; Khan AR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Apr; 53(4):1175-1187. PubMed ID: 33098227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward more robust and reproducible diffusion kurtosis imaging.
Henriques RN; Jespersen SN; Jones DK; Veraart J
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Sep; 86(3):1600-1613. PubMed ID: 33829542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simple noise correction scheme for diffusional kurtosis imaging.
Glenn GR; Tabesh A; Jensen JH
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 25172990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating apparent differences between standard DKI and axisymmetric DKI and its consequences for biophysical parameter estimates.
Oeschger JM; Tabelow K; Mohammadi S
Magn Reson Med; 2024 Jul; 92(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 38308141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A field-monitoring-based approach for correcting eddy-current-induced artifacts of up to the 2
Ma R; Akçakaya M; Moeller S; Auerbach E; Uğurbil K; Van de Moortele PF
Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116861. PubMed ID: 32305565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the use of trace-weighted images in body diffusional kurtosis imaging.
Giannelli M; Toschi N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 34(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 26706136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion kurtosis imaging with free water elimination: A bayesian estimation approach.
Collier Q; Veraart J; Jeurissen B; Vanhevel F; Pullens P; Parizel PM; den Dekker AJ; Sijbers J
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Aug; 80(2):802-813. PubMed ID: 29393531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE removal pipeline.
Ades-Aron B; Veraart J; Kochunov P; McGuire S; Sherman P; Kellner E; Novikov DS; Fieremans E
Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():532-543. PubMed ID: 30077743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast and robust estimation of diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) parameters by general closed-form expressions and their extensions.
Masutani Y; Aoki S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2014; 13(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 24769638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusional kurtosis imaging in head and neck cancer: On the use of trace-weighted images to estimate indices of non-Gaussian water diffusion.
Marzi S; Minosse S; Vidiri A; Piludu F; Giannelli M
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5411-5419. PubMed ID: 30317646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical cancer and its correlation with the differentiation process of cervical cancer.
Meng H; Guo X; Zhang D
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Sep; 23(1):144. PubMed ID: 37773061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DACO: Distortion/artefact correction for diffusion MRI data.
Hsu YC; Tseng WI
Neuroimage; 2022 Nov; 262():119571. PubMed ID: 35985619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
