324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30978559)
1. Third-generation CDK inhibitors: A review on the synthesis and binding modes of Palbociclib, Ribociclib and Abemaciclib.
Poratti M; Marzaro G
Eur J Med Chem; 2019 Jun; 172():143-153. PubMed ID: 30978559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inhibiting CDK4/6 in Breast Cancer with Palbociclib, Ribociclib, and Abemaciclib: Similarities and Differences.
Braal CL; Jongbloed EM; Wilting SM; Mathijssen RHJ; Koolen SLW; Jager A
Drugs; 2021 Feb; 81(3):317-331. PubMed ID: 33369721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Management of Potential Toxicities and Drug Interactions Related to Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: Practical Considerations and Recommendations.
Spring LM; Zangardi ML; Moy B; Bardia A
Oncologist; 2017 Sep; 22(9):1039-1048. PubMed ID: 28706010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors for the management of advanced or metastatic breast cancer in women.
Cersosimo RJ
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Aug; 76(16):1183-1202. PubMed ID: 31369120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biological specificity of CDK4/6 inhibitors: dose response relationship, in vivo signaling, and composite response signature.
Knudsen ES; Hutcheson J; Vail P; Witkiewicz AK
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):43678-43691. PubMed ID: 28620137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PROTACs suppression of CDK4/6, crucial kinases for cell cycle regulation in cancer.
Zhao B; Burgess K
Chem Commun (Camb); 2019 Feb; 55(18):2704-2707. PubMed ID: 30758029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in the current and future eras of cancer treatment.
Parylo S; Vennepureddy A; Dhar V; Patibandla P; Sokoloff A
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2019 Jan; 25(1):110-129. PubMed ID: 29726787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib.
Kwapisz D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 28741274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CDK4/6 blockade in breast cancer: current experience and future perspectives.
Zardavas D; Pondé N; Tryfonidis K
Expert Opin Investig Drugs; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1357-1372. PubMed ID: 29027483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CDK4/6 Inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in breast cancer: palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib.
Laderian B; Fojo T
Semin Oncol; 2017 Dec; 44(6):395-403. PubMed ID: 29935901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Update on the Clinical Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer.
Robert M; Frenel JS; Bourbouloux E; Rigaud DB; Patsouris A; Augereau P; Gourmelon C; Campone M
Drugs; 2018 Sep; 78(13):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 30143968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of treatment-related adverse events of different Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: A network meta-analysis.
Desnoyers A; Nadler MB; Kumar V; Saleh R; Amir E
Cancer Treat Rev; 2020 Nov; 90():102086. PubMed ID: 32861975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors as anticancer drugs: Recent advances (2015-2019).
Sánchez-Martínez C; Lallena MJ; Sanfeliciano SG; de Dios A
Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2019 Oct; 29(20):126637. PubMed ID: 31477350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemoproteomics Reveals Novel Protein and Lipid Kinase Targets of Clinical CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Lung Cancer.
Sumi NJ; Kuenzi BM; Knezevic CE; Remsing Rix LL; Rix U
ACS Chem Biol; 2015 Dec; 10(12):2680-6. PubMed ID: 26390342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a bioanalytical method for the quantification of the CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib in human and mouse matrices using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Martínez-Chávez A; Rosing H; Hillebrand M; Tibben M; Schinkel AH; Beijnen JH
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2019 Aug; 411(20):5331-5345. PubMed ID: 31209549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: differences in toxicity profiles and impact on agent choice. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Onesti CE; Jerusalem G
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2021 Mar; 21(3):283-298. PubMed ID: 33233970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can CDK4/6 inhibitors cause fatal lung injury?
Jazieh KA; Budd GT; Dalpiaz N; Abraham J
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2019 Nov; 19(11):917-919. PubMed ID: 31566017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective ATP competitive leads of CDK4: Discovery by 3D-QSAR pharmacophore mapping and molecular docking approach.
Rondla R; PadmaRao LS; Ramatenki V; Haredi-Abdel-Monsef A; Potlapally SR; Vuruputuri U
Comput Biol Chem; 2017 Dec; 71():224-229. PubMed ID: 29153893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain Exposure of Two Selective Dual CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibitors and the Antitumor Activity of CDK4 and CDK6 Inhibition in Combination with Temozolomide in an Intracranial Glioblastoma Xenograft.
Raub TJ; Wishart GN; Kulanthaivel P; Staton BA; Ajamie RT; Sawada GA; Gelbert LM; Shannon HE; Sanchez-Martinez C; De Dios A
Drug Metab Dispos; 2015 Sep; 43(9):1360-71. PubMed ID: 26149830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CDK4-6 inhibitors in breast cancer: current status and future development.
Choo JR; Lee SC
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):1123-1138. PubMed ID: 30360668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
