186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30980456)
1. Patterns of geographic variability in mortality and eligible deaths between organ procurement organizations.
Cannon RM; Jones CM; Davis EG; Franklin GA; Gupta M; Shah MB
Am J Transplant; 2019 Oct; 19(10):2756-2763. PubMed ID: 30980456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of National Organ Donation Rates and Organ Procurement Organization Metrics.
DeRoos LJ; Zhou Y; Marrero WJ; Tapper EB; Sonnenday CJ; Lavieri MS; Hutton DW; Parikh ND
JAMA Surg; 2021 Feb; 156(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 33263743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of incorporating standardized, verifiable, objective metrics of organ procurement organization performance into discussions about organ allocation.
Goldberg D; Karp S; Shah MB; Dubay D; Lynch R
Am J Transplant; 2019 Nov; 19(11):2973-2978. PubMed ID: 31199562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of donor consent mechanism on organ procurement organization performance in the United States.
Valikodath N; Lambert AN; Butler A; Lebovitz DJ; Chapman G; Xu M; Slaughter JC; Menachem JN; Godown J
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2023 May; 42(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 36868968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance.
Gentry SE; Chow EK; Massie A; Luo X; Zaun D; Snyder JJ; Israni AK; Kasiske B; Segev DL
Liver Transpl; 2015 Mar; 21(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 25556648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Procurement characteristics of high- and low-performing OPOs as seen in OPTN/SRTR data.
Lynch RJ; Doby BL; Goldberg DS; Lee KJ; Cimeno A; Karp SJ
Am J Transplant; 2022 Feb; 22(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 34510735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Organ procurement organization (OPO), best practices.
Bollinger RR; Heinrichs DR; Seem DL; Rosendale JD; Johnson KS;
Clin Transplant; 2001; 15 Suppl 6():16-21. PubMed ID: 11903381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changing Metrics of Organ Procurement Organization Performance in Order to Increase Organ Donation Rates in the United States.
Goldberg D; Kallan MJ; Fu L; Ciccarone M; Ramirez J; Rosenberg P; Arnold J; Segal G; Moritsugu KP; Nathan H; Hasz R; Abt PL
Am J Transplant; 2017 Dec; 17(12):3183-3192. PubMed ID: 28726327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A three-tier system for evaluation of organ procurement organizations' willingness to pursue and utilize nonideal donor lungs.
Halpern SE; McConnell A; Peskoe SB; Raman V; Jawitz OK; Choi AY; Neely ML; Palmer SM; Hartwig MG
Am J Transplant; 2021 Mar; 21(3):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33048423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using a standardized donor ratio to assess the performance of organ procurement organizations.
Stogis S; Hirth RA; Strawderman RL; Banaszak-Holl J; Smith DG
Health Serv Res; 2002 Oct; 37(5):1329-44. PubMed ID: 12479499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association Between Organ Procurement Organization Social Network Centrality and Kidney Discard and Transplant Outcomes.
Butala NM; King MD; Reitsma W; Formica RN; Abt PL; Reese PP; Parikh CR
Transplantation; 2015 Dec; 99(12):2617-24. PubMed ID: 26102610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agree on much, except it is time for change.
Samstein B; McElroy LM
Am J Transplant; 2019 Jul; 19(7):1912-1916. PubMed ID: 30884119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.
Doby BL; Ross-Driscoll K; Yu S; Godwin M; Lee KJ; Lynch RJ
Am J Transplant; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1614-1623. PubMed ID: 35118830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' proposed metrics for recertification of organ procurement organizations: Evaluation by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.
Snyder JJ; Musgrove D; Zaun D; Wey A; Salkowski N; Rosendale J; Israni AK; Hirose R; Kasiske BL
Am J Transplant; 2020 Sep; 20(9):2466-2480. PubMed ID: 32157810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organ Procurement Organization and transplant center effects on cadaver renal transplant outcomes.
Cho YW; Cecka JM
Clin Transpl; 1996; ():427-41. PubMed ID: 9286586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liver sharing and organ procurement organization performance under redistricted allocation.
Gentry SE; Chow EK; Massie A; Luo X; Shteyn E; Pyke J; Zaun D; Snyder JJ; Israni AK; Kasiske B; Segev DL
Liver Transpl; 2015 Aug; 21(8):1031-9. PubMed ID: 25990089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noneligible Donors as a Strategy to Decrease the Organ Shortage.
Croome KP; Lee DD; Keaveny AP; Taner CB
Am J Transplant; 2017 Jun; 17(6):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 27977900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptions of pediatric deceased donor consent: A survey of organ procurement organizations.
Chapman GB; Butler A; Lanyon M; Godown J; Lebovitz DJ
Pediatr Transplant; 2023 Jun; 27(4):e14514. PubMed ID: 36945079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.
Trotter JF; Osgood MJ
JAMA; 2004 Apr; 291(15):1871-4. PubMed ID: 15100206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying organ donation rates by donation service area.
Ojo AO; Pietroski RE; O'Connor K; McGowan JJ; Dickinson DM
Am J Transplant; 2005 Apr; 5(4 Pt 2):958-66. PubMed ID: 15760421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
