191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30980982)
1. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.
Shen H; Fogel GR; Zhu J; Liao Z; Liu W
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e1112-e1119. PubMed ID: 30980982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions.
Zhu J; Shen H; Cui Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Liu W
Orthop Surg; 2022 Sep; 14(9):2339-2349. PubMed ID: 35946442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar fusion with proximal interspinous process device implantation.
Shen H; Fogel GR; Zhu J; Liao Z; Liu W
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e3498. PubMed ID: 33998776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed interspinous process device conjunction with interbody cage based on a finite element model.
Bae IS; Bak KH; Chun HJ; Ryu JI; Park SJ; Lee SJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243771. PubMed ID: 33306706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis.
Liu Z; Zhang S; Li J; Tang H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jun; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 35715775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of four surgical scenarios of lumbar fusion with hyperlordotic interbody cage: A finite element study.
Zhang Z; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Sun Y; Sun X; Liu W
Biomed Mater Eng; 2018; 29(4):485-497. PubMed ID: 30282345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical advantages of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar interbody fusion compared with freehand technique in a prospective randomized controlled trial-perspective for patient-specific finite element analysis.
Kim HJ; Kang KT; Park SC; Kwon OH; Son J; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS; Lenke LG
Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):671-680. PubMed ID: 27867080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.
Erbulut DU; Zafarparandeh I; Hassan CR; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of lordosis on adjacent levels after lumbar interbody fusion, before and after removal of the spinal fixator: a finite element analysis.
Tsuang FY; Tsai JC; Lai DM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):470. PubMed ID: 31651312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining a relative total lumbar range of motion to alleviate adjacent segment degeneration after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis.
Li K; Cao S; Chen J; Qin J; Yuan B; Li J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Mar; 25(1):197. PubMed ID: 38443904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Evaluation of Rigid Interspinous Process Fixation Combined With Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Hybrid Testing Protocol.
Fan W; Zhang C; Zhang DX; Guo LX; Zhang M; Wang QD
J Biomech Eng; 2023 Jun; 145(6):. PubMed ID: 36695754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite Element Based-Analysis for Pre and Post Lumbar Fusion of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Patients.
Haddas R; Xu M; Lieberman I; Yang J
Spine Deform; 2019 Jul; 7(4):543-552. PubMed ID: 31202369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Analysis of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs with Various Fixation Options: Based on a Validated Finite Element Model.
Zhang Z; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Sun Y; Liu W
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1120-e1129. PubMed ID: 29609081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does oblique lumbar interbody fusion promote adjacent degeneration in degenerative disc disease: A finite element analysis.
Du CF; Cai XY; Gui W; Sun MS; Liu ZX; Liu CJ; Zhang CQ; Huang YP
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jan; 128():104122. PubMed ID: 33248365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel pedicle screw-based interspinous spacer: A finite element analysis.
Chen HC; Wu JL; Huang SC; Zhong ZC; Chiu SL; Lai YS; Cheng CK
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():27-32. PubMed ID: 28622909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical effect of bone resorption of the spinous process after single-segment interspinous dynamic stabilization device implantation: A finite element analysis.
Zhu ZQ; Duan S; Wang KF; Liu HY; Xu S; Liu CJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(27):e11140. PubMed ID: 29979380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
