208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30981676)
1. In vitro comparison of frictional forces of a new polycrystalline ceramic bracket versus metal-insert ceramic bracket before and after aging.
Dergham CA; Khoury E; Ghoubril J
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30981676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
Rajakulendran J; Jones S
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Frictional Forces Generated by a New Ceramic Bracket with the Conventional Brackets using Unconventional and Conventional Ligation System and the Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vitro Study.
Pasha A; Vishwakarma S; Narayan A; Vinay K; Shetty SV; Roy PP
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 7(9):108-13. PubMed ID: 26435628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
Guerrero AP; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Camargo ES; Vieira S
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlating Frictional Forces Generated by Different Bracket Types during Sliding and Surface Topography Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Optical Profilometer.
AlBadr AH; Talic NF
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 38514430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts.
Jones SP; Amoah KG
Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 17679533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy of ceramic self-ligating brackets and estimates of theoretical torsional play.
Lee Y; Lee DY; Kim YJ
Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 26756375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.
Reimann S; Bourauel C; Weber A; Dirk C; Lietz T
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 27142040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frictional forces and surface topography of a new ceramic bracket.
Tanne K; Matsubara S; Hotei Y; Sakuda M; Yoshida M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 8074092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets.
Reicheneder CA; Baumert U; Gedrange T; Proff P; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 17702795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the sliding resistance between three models of self-ligating ceramic brackets: An in vitro and micro-morphological study.
Bazergan N; Nicolas E; El Helou M
Int Orthod; 2023 Mar; 21(1):100719. PubMed ID: 36577305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of fine particle shot peening on surface friction of stainless steel and ceramic bracket slots.
Tribumrungsuk P; Khantachawana A; Janyaprasert K
Dent Mater J; 2022 Oct; 41(5):682-687. PubMed ID: 35644570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the friction force generated by monocristalyne and policristalyne ceramic brackets in sliding mechanics.
Pimentel RF; de Oliveira RS; Chaves Md; Elias CN; Gravina MA
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 23876959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
