208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30982436)
1. Development and Reliability of an Athlete Introductory Movement Screen for Use in Emerging Junior Athletes.
Rogers SA; Hassmén P; Roberts AH; Alcock A; Gilleard WL; Warmenhoven JS
Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2019 Nov; 31(4):448-457. PubMed ID: 30982436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.
Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Lorenson CL; Halfpap JP; Donofry DF; Walker MJ; Dugan JL; Childs JD
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 42(6):530-40. PubMed ID: 22585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining the Reliability of the Landing Error Scoring System With Raters Using the Standardized Instructions and Scoring Sheet.
Everard E; Lyons M; Harrison AJ
J Sport Rehabil; 2020 May; 29(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 31586431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-retest and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.
Shultz R; Anderson SC; Matheson GO; Marcello B; Besier T
J Athl Train; 2013; 48(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 23675792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Inter-rater Reliability of the Functional Movement Screen Within an Athletic Population Using Untrained Raters.
Leeder JE; Horsley IG; Herrington LC
J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Sep; 30(9):2591-9. PubMed ID: 23838983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional movement screen test: a reliable screening test for young elite ice hockey players.
Parenteau-G E; Gaudreault N; Chambers S; Boisvert C; Grenier A; Gagné G; Balg F
Phys Ther Sport; 2014 Aug; 15(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 24291023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How reliable are Functional Movement Screening scores? A systematic review of rater reliability.
Moran RW; Schneiders AG; Major KM; Sullivan SJ
Br J Sports Med; 2016 May; 50(9):527-36. PubMed ID: 26316583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Athletic Ability Assessment in Subelite Australian Rules Football Players.
Rogers DK; McKeown I; Parfitt G; Burgess D; Eston RG
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jan; 33(1):125-138. PubMed ID: 28777248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The inter and intra rater reliability of the Netball Movement Screening Tool.
Reid DA; Vanweerd RJ; Larmer PJ; Kingstone R
J Sci Med Sport; 2015 May; 18(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 24930074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time intersession and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.
Onate JA; Dewey T; Kollock RO; Thomas KS; Van Lunen BL; DeMaio M; Ringleb SI
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Feb; 26(2):408-15. PubMed ID: 22266547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen.
Smith CA; Chimera NJ; Wright NJ; Warren M
J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Apr; 27(4):982-7. PubMed ID: 22692121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter-Rater Reliability and Intra-Rater Reliability of Assessing the 2-Minute Push-Up Test.
Fielitz L; Coelho J; Horne T; Brechue W
Mil Med; 2016 Feb; 181(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 26837086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrasession and Intersession Reliability of Countermovement Jump Testing in Division-I Volleyball Athletes.
Carroll KM; Wagle JP; Sole CJ; Stone MH
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Nov; 33(11):2932-2935. PubMed ID: 31469764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. THE INTRA- AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF THE SOCCER INJURY MOVEMENT SCREEN (SIMS).
McCunn R; Aus der Fünten K; Govus A; Julian R; Schimpchen J; Meyer T
Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Feb; 12(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 28217416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.
Minick KI; Kiesel KB; Burton L; Taylor A; Plisky P; Butler RJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):479-86. PubMed ID: 20072050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of a commercially available and algorithm-based kinetic analysis software compared to manual-based software.
Carroll KM; Wagle JP; Sato K; DeWeese BH; Mizuguchi S; Stone MH
Sports Biomech; 2019 Feb; 18(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28949273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining Interrater and Intrarater Levels of Agreement in Students and Clinicians When Visually Evaluating Movement Proficiency During Screening Assessments.
Whelan D; Delahunt E; O'Reilly M; Hernandez B; Caulfield B
Phys Ther; 2019 Apr; 99(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 30657981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-Retest Reliability of Static and Countermovement Power Push-Up Tests in Young Male Athletes.
Bohannon NA; Gillen ZM; Shoemaker ME; McKay BD; Gibson SM; Cramer JT
J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Sep; 34(9):2456-2464. PubMed ID: 32865943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and Reliability of the PUSH Wearable Device to Measure Movement Velocity During the Back Squat Exercise.
Balsalobre-Fernández C; Kuzdub M; Poveda-Ortiz P; Campo-Vecino JD
J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jul; 30(7):1968-74. PubMed ID: 26670993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Movement Competency Screens Can Be Reliable In Clinical Practice By A Single Rater Using The Composite Score.
Mann KJ; O'Dwyer N; Bruton MR; Bird SP; Edwards S
Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2022; 17(4):593-604. PubMed ID: 35693862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
